Laserfiche WebLink
Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Basin Groundwater Management Plan <br />Northeastern San Joaquin County Section 2 <br />Groundwater Banking Authority 71 Hydrogeology <br />Table 2-3 Simplified Groundwater Balance for Eastern San Joaquin County <br />Groundwater Flow Component Average Value Explanation <br />Inflows (af) <br />Deep Percolation/Recharge 608,400 Net infiltration from rainfall, <br />irrigation, canal leakage etc. <br />Gain from Streams 198,170 Net inflow from streams to <br />groundwater system <br />Lateral Inflow 98,000 Net of subsurface inflows and <br />outflows. <br />Total Inflows 904,577 <br />Outflows (af) <br />Groundwater Pumping 867,600 Net agricultural, municipal and <br />industrial pumping <br />Loss to Streams 108,898 Net outflow from groundwater <br />system to streams <br />Lateral Outflow 35,300 Subsurface Outflows <br />Total Outflows 1,011,815 <br />Groundwater Overdraft (af) <br />Mined Aquifer Storage 107,238 Total Inflows minus Total Outflows <br />Estimated Saline Intrusion 42,000* Lateral Saline Intrusion into the <br />Stockton Area <br />Total Estimated Overdraft 150,700 Sum of Mined Aquifer Storage and <br />Saline Intrusion <br />Notes <br />Source: San Joaquin County Water Management Plan Volume I <br />2.3.7 Saline Groundwater Intrusion <br />Groundwater flow in the Basin now converges on the depression with relatively steep <br />groundwater gradients eastward from the Delta toward the cone of depression as depicted in <br />Figures 2-3 and 2-4. The eastward flow from the Delta area is significant because of the <br />typically poorer quality water now moving eastward in the Stockton area. Increased lateral <br />inflow from the west is undesirable, as this water is typically higher in TDS and chloride levels <br />and causes the degradation of water quality in the Basin. Figure 2-9 illustrates the approximate <br />location of the 300 mg/L isochlor as measured in 2000. Projections indicate that the rate of <br />eastward migration of the saline front is approximately 150 to 250 feet per year. Figure 2-9 also <br />shows the projected 2030 location of the 300 mg/L isochlor under no-action conditions. <br />Degradation of water quality due to TDS or chloride contamination threatens the long-term <br />sustainability of a very important water resource for San Joaquin County, since water high in <br />TDS and/or chloride is unusable for either urban drinking water needs or for irrigating crops. <br />Damage to the aquifer system could for all practical purposes be irreversible due to saline water <br />intrusion, withdrawal of groundwater from storage, and potentially subsidence and aquifer <br />consolidation. The saline intrusion problem is not well understood by the Authority. Further <br />studies and monitoring methods are necessary to ensure the problem is addressed and <br />monitored adequately. Section 4 discusses further the current groundwater monitoring program <br />and future actions to be undertaken by the Authority and its member agencies.