Laserfiche WebLink
Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Basin Groundwater Management Plan <br />Northeastern San Joaquin County Section 8 <br />Groundwater Banking Authority 133 Integrated Conjunctive Use Program <br />all water diverted through Strawberry (Pinecrest) Reservoir and Lyons Reservoir in excess of <br />the required in-stream flows. The amount of water available annually is dependent upon the <br />natural flow of the South Fork of the Stanislaus River which has an average annual yield of <br />approximately 100,000 af including 24,000 af combined storage in Strawberry and Lyons <br />Reservoirs (http://www.tuolumneutilities.com/uwmp.pdf, 2000). <br />TUD is currently evaluating the possibility of replacing the existing Lyons Dam to create a larger <br />reservoir to provide enough water for future development. The current capacity of Lyons <br />Reservoir is 6,219 af, and the current spillway elevation is 4,214-ft. TUD has contemplated <br />either a 25,000 af or 50,000 af reservoir with surface elevations of 4,285-ft and 4,328-ft <br />respectively. Both options would be located 800-ft downstream of the current dam. The <br />estimated cost of a new 50,000 af reservoir is $26 million. A map of the 50,000 af option is <br />shown in Figure 8-19. SEWD has expressed interest in partnering with TUD for supplemental <br />water supplies from the Lyons Reservoir enlargement <br />(http://www.cserc.org/news/newsletter/2003winter/Lyons.html, 2003). <br />8.3 Groundwater Recharge Components <br />For planning purposes, the following descriptions represent the final use of water. The <br />components include groundwater recharge infrastructure and improvements, drinking water <br />treatment facilities, and agency conjunctive use programs. <br />8.3.1 Farmington Program <br />In 1997, the USACE completed the Farmington Dam and Reservoir Conjunctive Use Study, <br />which evaluated potential structural and operational changes at Farmington Dam and Reservoir <br />as part of a conjunctive use program. The study found that long-term storage at Farmington <br />Reservoir is not cost-effective; however, operational modifications and the construction of <br />groundwater recharge facilities are cost-effective. Consequently, the USACE, SEWD, and local <br />water interests embarked on the development of a groundwater recharge program. In 1999 the <br />U.S. Congress authorized up to $25 million for construction of groundwater recharge and <br />conjunctive use projects in Eastern San Joaquin County. <br />In 2001, SEWD completed the Farmington Groundwater Recharge/Seasonal Habitat Study <br />(Farmington Study) to evaluate the physical and financial feasibility of a groundwater recharge <br />program in Eastern San Joaquin County. Through pilot testing, the study team found that the <br />most effective area for groundwater recharge is the area bounded by Highway 99, Jack Tone <br />Road, the City of Manteca, and the Mokelumne River. A map of the general area is shown in <br />Figure 8-20. The Farmington Study also explored the feasibility of various recharge techniques <br />and concluded that the most efficient method of groundwater recharge in Eastern San Joaquin <br />County is the use of field flooding, recharge basins, and excavated pits. Each method varies in <br />average water depth from a few inches to several feet. Figure 8-21 illustrates the various <br />methods of recharge used in the Farmington Program. Existing structures and improvements <br />such as flood detention basins, quarry excavations, canals, and clarifiers can also be easily <br />modified and incorporated in to the project. <br />In November of 2003, the District received $1.3 million from the DWR for a Proposition 13 grant <br />to complete the first pilot project facilities adjacent to the SEWD Treatment Plan. The pilot <br />project is a permanent facility consisting of one 19-acre pond and three recharge basins totaling <br />35 acres. These facilities are expected to recharge 7,000 af/yr. In February of 2004, the pilot <br />project was named the Water/Environment Project of the Year, 2003, by the American Society <br />of Civil Engineers.