My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0084717_SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
285
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0084717_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2022 12:18:44 PM
Creation date
1/13/2022 9:53:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0084717
PE
2602
FACILITY_NAME
285 S AUSTIN RD
STREET_NUMBER
285
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
22802048
ENTERED_DATE
1/12/2022 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
285 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\tsok
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1028
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
80 Part i california Water <br />County’s Groundwater Replenishment System, a partnership between the <br />Orange County Water District and the Orange County Sanitation District, <br />which recharges the groundwater basin with highly treated, potable wastewater <br />(Groundwater Replenishment System, undated). Some parts of inland Southern <br />California have also reclaimed groundwater that was too saline or otherwise <br />contaminated for untreated use (California Department of Water Resources <br />2009).5 <br />Storage and Movement to Population and Farming Centers <br />Water is moved from wetter to drier areas through a network of rivers, canals, <br />aqueducts, and pipelines (Figure 2.6). This network of federal, state, and local <br />projects connects local water users with local and statewide water sources <br />and reflects the history of water management (Chapter 1). Although the State <br />Water Project, the Central Valley Project, and other federal projects are the <br />most extensive storage and conveyance projects supporting agricultural and <br />urban water use, major local and regional projects also store and deliver dis- <br />tant supplies to urban centers in the San Francisco Bay Area and Southern <br />California. The hub of both the SWP and CVP systems, and the link between <br />Northern and Southern California, is the network of channels within the <br />Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta. This conveyance hub is at significant risk of <br />failure from flood and earthquake risks to the fragile levees that surround the <br />Delta’s man-made islands, most of which now lie well below sea level (Chapter 3) <br />(Lund et al. 2010; Suddeth, Mount, and Lund 2010). <br />The state’s elaborate conveyance network is coupled with an extensive sur- <br />face water storage system, capable of storing about half the average annual <br />statewide runoff (Figure 2.6, Table 2.1). Most surface storage is located near <br />the source, far from major farming and urban centers. The state’s capacity for <br />storing water in aquifers is far greater and much of this capacity is nearer to <br />water users. <br />Surface and groundwater reservoirs have different advantages and draw- <br />backs. Surface reservoirs can fill quickly and release water fairly quickly, making <br />them flexible for water supply and flood management. But expanding surface <br />storage capacity is costly and ecologically damaging. Groundwater storage <br />5. As discussed further in Chapter 6, many local agencies are looking to recycled water as a costly, but relatively stable, <br />alternative to supplies imported from distant locations. Ocean water desalination, which relies on similar treatment <br />technologies, also is being considered in some coastal areas. In contrast to coastal areas, where wastewater reuse results <br />in a net expansion of water supplies for the region, expanding reuse of upstream wastewater to support new development <br />is likely to increase upstream net water use and reduce return flows to downstream users (Box 2.1).
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.