Laserfiche WebLink
V CVSHealth <br /> Ms. Florido <br /> March 29, 2019 <br /> Page 2 <br /> As you may know, on November 4, 2011,U.S. EPA issued a memorandum titled <br /> Containers that Once Held P-Listed Pharmaceuticals, in which EPA clarified that"it is only the <br /> residue in the non-RCRA-empty container that is considered a P-listed hazardous waste;the <br /> container itself is not a hazardous waste. Accordingly, it is only the weight of residue in the <br /> container that needs to be counted toward generator status;the weight of the container does not <br /> need to be counted toward generator status." In accordance with this EPA memorandum, CVS <br /> counts only the weight of warfarin residue toward a facility's generator status. <br /> Federal Hazardous Waste Pharmaceuticals Rule. On February 22, 2019, EPA's final <br /> Management Standards for Hazardous Waste Pharmaceuticals and Amendment to the P075 <br /> Listing for Nicotine ("Pharm Rule")was published in the Federal Register (84 Fed. Reg. 5816). <br /> The Pharm Rule codifies EPA's position regarding containers that once held acute and non-acute <br /> hazardous waste. With respect to dispensing bottles,vials, or ampules (not to exceed 1 liter or <br /> 1,000 pills) or unit-dose containers,the new 40 CFR 266.507 (effective at the federal level on <br /> August 21, 2019)indicates that these containers are"considered empty and the residues are not <br /> regulated as hazardous waste provided the pharmaceuticals have been removed from the stock <br /> bottle, dispensing bottle,vial, ampule, or the unit-dose container using the practices commonly <br /> employed to remove materials from that type of container." 40 CFR 266.507. Based on this <br /> provision, containers that previously held acute hazardous pharmaceuticals no longer require <br /> triple rinsing to be considered"RCRA empty." Also based on this provision, since containers <br /> are considered empty and the residues also do not have to be regulated as hazardous waste, <br /> neither the residue nor the container counts toward a facility's generator status at the federal <br /> level. We highlight several important considerations from the Pharm Rule preamble: <br /> 1. EPA reviewed data and confirmed that very little residue remains in containers after the <br /> pharmaceuticals have been removed. EPA then concluded that the containers (and the <br /> residue) do not require management as hazardous waste. Specifically, in the Pharm <br /> Rule,EPA references back to several studies that EPA discussed in the preamble to the <br /> proposed rule. Based on the studies, although some residues remain in containers, EPA <br /> concluded that the residues are minimal and that these containers are effectively empty <br /> once the pharmaceuticals have been dispensed. EPA ultimately determined that residue <br /> data for single-unit dose containers/packaging and dispensing bottles,vials and ampules <br /> that once held p-listed pharmaceuticals (warfarin) can be considered effectively"RCRA <br /> empty." Given the size of the containers and"nominal quantities of residues involved," <br /> EPA proposed(and ultimately finalized)to allow the residues in these containers to be <br /> managed as non-hazardous waste pharmaceuticals, so long as the pharmaceutical product <br /> has been fully dispensed. The specific studies—two from stakeholders; one from <br /> Riverside County, California; and one from EPA's Office of Research and Development <br /> —and EPA's conclusions regarding these studies are discussed at 80 Federal Register <br /> 58051 through 58054 of the proposed Pharmaceuticals Rule. These pages are attached. <br /> (; pharmacy / caremark / minute clinic / specialty <br />