Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Angie Manetti <br /> August 2, 2018 <br /> Page 2 <br /> toward generator status. U.S. EPA added that the weight of the container does not <br /> need to be counted toward generator status. <br /> CRA's request stems primarily from concern that "counting the weight of these non- <br /> empty containers towards generator status almost ensures that many pharmacies will <br /> become higher level hazardous waste generators." <br /> RATIONALE FOR REGULATORY APPROACH <br /> CRA recommends that DTSC follow recent U.S. EPA guidance which °consistently <br /> support[s]the intent of the [federal] regulations to only regulate the residue in the <br /> container, not the container itself." <br /> In reviewing CRA's recommendation, DTSC agrees that U.S. EPA's 2011 memorandum <br /> is more consistent with federal hazardous waste regulations applicable to containers. <br /> As was stated in that letter, if a container holding an acute hazardous waste is not <br /> emptied as specified in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), section 261.7(b)(3) "... <br /> is not considered RCRA empty even though the pharmaceutical is fully dispensed. If <br /> the container is not RCRA empty then the residues, [as specified in 40 Code of Federal <br /> Regulations, section 261.33(c)] are regulated as hazardous waste." <br /> Furthermore, this approach is consistent with other criteria in federal regulations. The <br /> federal container requirement states the following in 40 Code of Federal Regulation, <br /> section 261.7(a)(2) concerning non-empty containers: <br /> `Any hazardous waste in either a container that is not empty or an inner liner <br /> removed from a container that is not empty, as defined in paragraph (b) of this <br /> section, is subject to regulation underparts 269 through 268, 270 and 924 of this <br /> chapter and to the notification requirements of section 3090 of RCRA." <br /> Under this requirement, it was not U.S. EPA's intent to regulate the container itself but <br /> only the hazardous waste within, i.e., the acute hazardous waste residue remaining in <br /> the container. <br /> However, DTSC cannot apply the 2011 memorandum in California because it is <br /> inconsistent with DTSC's hazardous waste regulations applicable to contaminated <br /> containers. When DTSC adopted regulations for contaminated containers, it did not <br /> adopt U.S. EPA's approach of addressing only the residues inside the containers. <br /> Instead, DTSC adopted container regulations that consider the whole contaminated <br /> container hazardous waste and not just the residual inside. California Code of <br /> Regulations, title 22, section 66261.7(x) states: <br />