Laserfiche WebLink
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br />UST WORKSHEET FOR SITE CLOSURE EVALUATION <br />1. FACILITYITANK INFORMATION DATE: I May 8, 2017 <br />SITEIFACILITY NAME: I Single Facility Residence STATUS CODE: <br />ADDRESS: 8476 E Kettleman Lane, Lodi, CA 95240 CITY: Lodi <br />FA#: FA0023769 PR#:PR0541462 TANK #139- TA0520816 <br />TANK SIZE: 350 FUEL TYPE: gasoline <br />II_ GENERAL SITE HISTORY <br />Is Permit Current? ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 NA <br />Documented Soil/GW Contamination?" ❑ Yes `X) No <br />Number of Tanks at Facility 17 Age of Tanks (if available) <br />40 years (approx.) <br />Type of Tank ASteel ❑Fiberglass Single <br />❑Dual <br />III. I ANK MIU I UKY <br />Was Tank Tested? ❑Yes 4No ❑ NA <br />Failed Testing? ❑ Yes ❑ No 4 NA <br />If Yes, Provide Dates: <br />Was Tank System Repaired? ❑Yes ❑ No NA <br />I If Yes, Describe Repair: <br />Was Repair Done Under Permit? ❑Yes R No 17 NA Were Sal Samples Analyzed?Yes ❑ NoI <br />BTEXXTPH-G L3TPH-D J4 LEAD EJ EDB <br />OTHER ❑OXYGENATES <br />Type of Failure/Discharge: ❑ Catastrophic ❑ Long-term Leak ❑ Overfill XUnknown ❑ Other <br />■Lo■:aiL911►_1MiIN 101:4M 1WT44A21ra <br />Soil Samples Received? Yes ❑ No <br />Seasonal High Depth to GW _I 3,0 ft bgs <br />Year/ Reference <br />Z� <br />Onsite and/or Nearby Well(s)? ❑ Yes ❑ No <br />LJ Irrigation: # Distance to Tank ft <br />C <br />Score 10 <br />C <br />Score 9 <br />C <br />_>d)omestic: #--L- Distance to Tank -7-0 ft <br />0 <br />points if <br />0 <br />points if <br />Score 5 points if <br />❑ Public: # Distance to Tank ft <br />R <br />E <br />condition is <br />met <br />R <br />E <br />condition is <br />met <br />0 <br />R <br />E <br />condition is met <br />V. SITE FEATURE - LEACHING POTENTIAL ANALYSIS <br />Minimum Depth to Groundwater from Soil Sample (feet) <br />(Q <br />>100 <br />51 -100 <br />25-501 <br />Fractures in Subsurface (applies to foothill or mountain areas) <br />(0 <br />None <br />Unknown <br />Present <br />Average Annual Precipitation (14 inches for SJC area) <br />-------- <br /><10 <br />9 <br />10-25 <br />-------- <br />26-402 <br />Man -Made Conduits which Increase Vertical Migration <br />None <br />Unknown <br />Present <br />i.e. septic sstems, water wells,ponds) <br />Unique Site Features Recharge Area, Coarse Soil (coarse sands, <br />r <br />None <br />At Least One <br />More Than One <br />ravels, nearby wells <br />l� <br />Column Totals Total Points�J <br />+ <br />+ <br />_ 3iJ <br />Sample Results for BTEX: <br />Range of Total Points <br />49 Points or More <br />41- 48 Points <br />40 Points or Less <br />B <br />E <br />T �� <br />Maximum Allowable BTEX <br />Levels <br />B <br />1.0 <br />T <br />50 <br />E <br />50 <br />X <br />50 <br />B <br />0.3 <br />T <br />0.3 <br />X <br />1.0 <br />N/A3 <br />(ppm) <br />0 <br />X <br />Sample Results for TPH: <br />Maximum <br />Gasoline <br />1,000 <br />100 <br />10 <br />Allowable TPH <br />tV <br />Levels m <br />Diesel <br />10,000 <br />1,000 <br />100 <br />Footnotes, ***If documented soil and/or groundwater contamination is present, do not complete leaching potential analysis (i.e. site is already on the contamination list). <br />1 If depth is >5 feet and < 25 feet, score 0 points. If depth is <=5 feet, do not use table. 2 If precipitation is > 40 inches, sure 0 points. <br />3 Levels for BTEX are not applicable at a concentration of 10 pprn for TPH—Gasoline or 100 ppm for TPH-Diesel. <br />VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION/ REFERRAL/ REVIEW <br />1. Are BTEX or TPH Concentrations > Allowable Levels? ❑ Yes No 2. If No, Is Site Closure Recommended? A Yes ❑ No <br />Completed By: �/-Z.r <br />Date Referred to Site Mitigation Unit for Final Actiont <br />Reviewed By: <br />Concur with Staff Recommendation ❑ Yes ❑ No <br />Date Closure Letter Mailed <br />tAll Cases are Referred to Site Mitigation for Final Action <br />EH 23-0080 (Rev 11114/08) <br />