SU0014690 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Item No. 7 PC: 4-18-85 S-85-3 Page 2 The difficulty stated by the City of Stockton could affect the project's annexation into the City boundaries should such an action be undertaken. A staff concern of the proposed division is the separation bet- ween the project's access and the private roadway immediately adjacent to the east. To ensure separation between the two and to preclude traffic crossover, staff will recommend the erec- tion of a suitable barrier as a condition of approval (see Public Works's condition of approval). A prior request for a 24 -unit Planned Unit Development had been denied by action of the Board of Supervisors (S-83-9 & PUD -83-2, denied September 1983). The denial was based on a question of access over property abutting the project to the east. (However, a similar subdivision request on the site was approved by the Board of Supervisors in November 1979.) Since the project's primary access will be on the property under con- sideration, the reason for the previous denial does not affect this application. The requested subdivision will have full urban services of sewer, water, and drainage. An Initial Study has been prepared for the request. Based on the study, a Negative Declaration is being recommended. FINDINGS A. The proposed map is consistent with applicable General and Specific Plans: The request is consistent with the Residential Low Density development standards. B. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable General and Specific Plans: The proposal meets the requirements of the General Plan for the provision of urban services. C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development: The area is rectangular and flat. It is suited for resi- dential development. D. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development: The site is suitable for the proposed 3 units per acre average density.