SU0014623 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

or r' REVISED STAFF REPORT Item No. 4 PC: 11-7-85 SU -86-1 Page 5 REVISED FINDINGS (NOVEMBER 7, 1985) 1. The proposed map is consistent with applicable General and Specific Plans because the site is designated Limit ' evidence submitted for this project indicates that a 60' street will be adequite to serve the proposed subdivision. There are no applicable Specific Pians. 2. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is con- sistent with applicable General and Specific Plans because public sewage disposal, water supply, and storm drainage systems are not required at the project site. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development because the parcels are now vacant and contain at least four acres each, an area adequate to support an industrial use. 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development because a separate lot is reserved to accommodate the drainage area requirements of future uses; no specific use is proposed at this time; and specific use proposals will be subject to future application review. 5. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantialy and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because the Initial Study concluded that the sub- division would not have a significant effect on the environ- ment. 6. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems because ^tto applieatien review en a ease-by-easeb as no health problems resulting from this proposal have been identified. 7. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed sub- division unless it is found that alternate easements, for access or for use, will be provided, and that these will be