Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. 4 <br />PC: 11-7-85 <br />SU -86-1 <br />Page 1 <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />It is recommended that the Planning Commission: <br />1. Approve the Negative Declaration. <br />2. Approve the Major Subdivision subject to the attached con- <br />ditions and based on the findings listed below. <br />FINDINGS <br />1. The proposed map is consistent with applicable General and <br />Specific Plans because the site is designated Limited <br />Industrial, and the Marty Court improvements, including a <br />60 -foot -wide right-of-way, a 40 -foot -wide paved road, and <br />curbs and gutters, are adequate for limited industrial uses. <br />2. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is con- <br />sistent with applicable General and Specific Plans because <br />public sewage disposal, water supply, and storm drainage <br />systems are not required at the project site. <br />3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development <br />because the parcels are now vacant and contain at least four <br />acres each, an area adequate to support an industrial use. <br />4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of <br />development because a separate lot is reserved to accommodate <br />the drainage area requirements of future uses; no specific use <br />is proposed at this time; and specific use proposals will be <br />subject to future application review. <br />5. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are <br />not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or <br />substantialy and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their <br />habitat because the Initial Study concluded that the sub- <br />division would not have a significant effect on the environ- <br />ment. <br />6. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is <br />not likely to cause serious public health problems because <br />only those uses permitted in the M-1 (Limited Manufacturing) <br />zone could be established; specific use proposals will be sub- <br />ject to application review on a case-by-case basis. <br />7. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will <br />not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, <br />for access through or use of property within the proposed sub- <br />division unless it is found that alternate easements, for <br />access or for use, will be provided, and that these will be <br />substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the <br />