My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2022
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAGNER
>
200
>
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
>
PR0513594
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2022 4:23:59 PM
Creation date
2/14/2022 12:48:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2022
RECORD_ID
PR0513594
PE
2229
FACILITY_ID
FA0007670
FACILITY_NAME
SPX COOLING TECHNOLOGIES INC
STREET_NUMBER
200
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAGNER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
15902010
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
200 N WAGNER AVE
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
361
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SPX CORPORATION ORDER R5-2019-0018 <br /> SPX MARLEY COOLING TECHNOLOGIES GROUNDWATER CLEANUP NPDES NO. CA0081787 <br /> limitations is not required to protect beneficial uses. Calculating effluent <br /> limitations based on the lowest measured ambient hardness is not required by <br /> the CTR or SIP and is not reasonable as it would result in overly conservative <br /> limits that will impart substantial costs to the Discharger and ratepayers without <br /> providing any additional protection of beneficial uses. In compliance with <br /> applicable state and federal regulatory requirements, after considering the <br /> entire range of ambient hardness values, Board staff has used the ambient <br /> hardness values shown in Table F-6 to calculate the proposed effluent <br /> limitations for hardness-dependent metals. The proposed effluent limitations <br /> are protective of beneficial uses under all flow conditions. <br /> iii. Using an ambient hardness that is higher than the minimum of 56 mg/L will <br /> result in limits that may allow increased metals to be discharged to the river, <br /> but such discharge is allowed under the State Antidegradation Policy (State <br /> Water Board Resolution 68-16). The Central Valley Water Board finds that this <br /> degradation is consistent with the antidegradation policy (see antidegradation <br /> findings in Section IV.D.4 of the Fact Sheet). The Antidegradation policy <br /> requires the Discharger to meet waste discharge requirements which will result <br /> in the best practicable treatment or control of the discharge necessary to <br /> assure that: a) a pollution or nuisance will not occur, and b) the highest water <br /> quality consistent with maximum benefit to the people of the State will be <br /> maintained. <br /> iv. Using the ambient hardness values shown in Table F-4 is consistent with the <br /> CTR and SIP's requirements for developing metals criteria. <br /> Table F-4. Summary of CTR Criteria for Hardness-dependent Metals <br /> Ambient CTR Criteria <br /> CTR Metals Hardness (lag/L, total recoverable)' <br /> (mg/L)2,3 acute chronic <br /> Copper 123 17 11.1 <br /> Chromium III 123 2060 250 <br /> Cadmium 89 (acute) 4.0 2.9 <br /> 123 chronic <br /> Lead 89 70 2.7 <br /> Nickel 123 560 62 <br /> Silver 89 3.3 -- <br /> Zinc 123 143 143 <br /> ' Metal criteria rounded to two significant figures in accordance with the CTR (40 C.F.R. <br /> §131.38(b)(2)). <br /> 2 The ambient hardness values in this table represent actual observed receiving water <br /> hardness measurements from the dataset shown in Figure F-1. <br /> 3 The CTR's hardness dependent metals criteria equations vary differently depending <br /> on the metal, which results in differences in the range of ambient hardness values that <br /> may be used to develop effluent limitations that are protective of beneficial uses and <br /> comply with CTR criteria for all ambient flow conditions. <br /> Background <br /> The State Water Board provided direction regarding the selection of hardness in two <br /> precedential water quality orders; WQO 2008-0008 for the City of Davis Wastewater <br /> Treatment Plant (Davis Order) and WQO 2004-0013 for the Yuba City Wastewater <br /> Treatment Plant (Yuba City Order). The State Water Board recognized that the SIP <br /> ATTACHMENT F- FACT SHEET F-15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.