My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2022
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAGNER
>
200
>
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
>
PR0513594
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2022 4:23:59 PM
Creation date
2/14/2022 12:48:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2022
RECORD_ID
PR0513594
PE
2229
FACILITY_ID
FA0007670
FACILITY_NAME
SPX COOLING TECHNOLOGIES INC
STREET_NUMBER
200
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAGNER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
15902010
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
200 N WAGNER AVE
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
361
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SPX CORPORATION ORDER R5-2019-0018 <br /> SPX MARLEY COOLING TECHNOLOGIES GROUNDWATER CLEANUP NPDES NO. CA0081787 <br /> approximately October to April each year, the East Stockton Water District <br /> dams the Calaveras River at its fork with Upper Mormon Slough, diverting <br /> flows through Upper Mormon Slough and the Stockton Diverting Canal. <br /> The Discharger collects background receiving water data upstream at <br /> RSW-001 located 7500 ft upstream from discharge point, and downstream <br /> at station RSW-002 located 1450 ft from discharge point (Figure B-1). <br /> Flow data for the receiving water is obtained by the Discharger from the <br /> California Data Exchange Center, which reports flow data from a US Army <br /> Corps of Engineers monitoring station (Station MRS) located <br /> approximately 13 miles upstream from the discharge point (Figure B-2). <br /> With the agricultural use along the canal it is unlikely the flows measured <br /> 13 miles upstream of the discharge are representative of flows at the <br /> discharge. Therefore, conducting the RPA using the TSD mass balance <br /> approach, which considers flow and dilution is not feasible. Instead, RPA <br /> was conducted by evaluating quarterly TDS data measured in the canal at <br /> receiving water monitoring stations RSW-001 and RSW-002 to determine <br /> if the discharge is causing or contributing to an exceedance of the <br /> applicable water quality objectives that protect MUN and AGR beneficial <br /> uses. <br /> MUN Beneficial Use. Title 22, section 64449 of the California Code of <br /> Regulations requires that secondary MCLs for TDS be applied on an <br /> annual basis. The annual average concentrations of TDS in the receiving <br /> water downstream of the discharge point are consistently below the <br /> secondary MCL of 500 mg/L (see Table F-8 below). This demonstrates <br /> there is no reasonable potential for TDS based on the MUN beneficial use <br /> of the Stockton Diverting Canal. <br /> Table F-8. Downstream TDS Concentration (Annual Averages) <br /> Year Ann.Avg. Conc. (mg/L) <br /> 2017 91 <br /> 2016 168 <br /> 2015 (1) <br /> 2014 173 <br /> (1) No flow in the Stockton Diverting Canal. <br /> AGR Beneficial Use. From approximately April to October each year, <br /> flows are split between the Calaveras River and Upper Mormon Slough. <br /> A series of check dams are installed along the Calaveras River, Upper <br /> Mormon Slough, and the Stockton Diverting Canal to provide irrigation <br /> water for farmers adjacent to the Stockton Diverting Canal. The <br /> agricultural use of water from the Stockton Diverting Canal is by request <br /> only, meaning that in dry summer months the farmers can request water <br /> be let into the canal for their use. When this occurs, there is sufficient <br /> dilution and assimilative capacity for TDS in the canal. <br /> As shown in Table F-9 above, the TDS downstream of the discharge is <br /> typically below applicable objectives. In Table F-9 the only year where <br /> TDS levels were elevated was in 2015. During this period the Discharger <br /> reported no flow at RSW-001, so TDS was not measured at RSW-001. <br /> The downstream TDS concentrations during that period are similar to the <br /> ATTACHMENT F— FACT SHEET F-24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.