My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2022
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAGNER
>
200
>
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
>
PR0513594
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2022 4:23:59 PM
Creation date
2/14/2022 12:48:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2022
RECORD_ID
PR0513594
PE
2229
FACILITY_ID
FA0007670
FACILITY_NAME
SPX COOLING TECHNOLOGIES INC
STREET_NUMBER
200
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAGNER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
15902010
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
200 N WAGNER AVE
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
361
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SPX CORPORATION ORDER R5-2019-0018 <br /> SPX MARLEY COOLING TECHNOLOGIES GROUNDWATER CLEANUP NPDES NO. CA0081787 <br /> with all standard provisions and with those additional conditions that are applicable under <br /> section 122.42. <br /> Sections 122.41(a)(1) and (b) through (n) of 40 C.F.R. establish conditions that apply to all <br /> state-issued NPDES permits. These conditions must be incorporated into the permits either <br /> expressly or by reference. If incorporated by reference, a specific citation to the regulations <br /> must be included in the Order. Section 123.25(a)(12) of 40 C.F.R. allows the state to omit or <br /> modify conditions to impose more stringent requirements. In accordance with 40 C.F.R. <br /> section 123.25, this Order omits federal conditions that address enforcement authority <br /> specified in 40 C.F.R. sections 122.410)(5) and (k)(2) because the enforcement authority <br /> under the Water Code is more stringent. In lieu of these conditions, this Order incorporates by <br /> reference Water Code section 13387(e). <br /> B. Special Provisions <br /> 1. Reopener Provisions <br /> a. Whole Effluent Toxicity. This Order requires the Discharger to investigate the <br /> causes of and identify corrective actions to reduce or eliminate effluent toxicity <br /> through a site-specific Toxicity Reduction Evaluation (TRE) or, under certain <br /> circumstances, may be allowed to participate in an approved Toxicity Evaluation <br /> Study (TES) in lieu of conducting a site-specific TRE. This Order may be reopened <br /> to include a new chronic toxicity limitation, a new acute toxicity limitation, and/or a <br /> limitation for a specific toxicant identified in the TRE and/or TES. <br /> b. Water Effects Ratio (WER) and Metal Translators. A default WER of 1.0 has <br /> been used in this Order for calculating criteria for applicable inorganic constituents. <br /> In addition, default dissolved-to-total metal translators have been used to convert <br /> water quality objectives from dissolved to total recoverable when developing effluent <br /> limitations for copper. If the Discharger performs studies to determine site-specific <br /> WERs and/or site-specific dissolved-to-total metal translators, this Order may be <br /> reopened to modify the effluent limitations for the applicable inorganic constituents. <br /> 2. Special Studies and Additional Monitoring Requirements <br /> a. Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Requirements. The Basin Plan contains a <br /> narrative toxicity objective that states, "All waters shall be maintained free of toxic <br /> substances in concentrations that produce detrimental physiological responses in <br /> human, plant, animal, or aquatic life." (Basin Plan at page Section 3.1.20) Based on <br /> whole effluent chronic toxicity testing performed by the Discharger from <br /> January 2014 through June 2018, the discharge does not have reasonable potential <br /> to cause or contribute to an in-stream excursion above of the Basin Plan's narrative <br /> toxicity objective. <br /> The Monitoring and Reporting Program of this Order requires chronic WET <br /> monitoring to demonstrate compliance with the Basin Plan's narrative toxicity <br /> objective. If the discharge exceeds the chronic toxicity monitoring trigger this <br /> provision requires the Discharger either participate in an approved Toxicity <br /> Evaluation Study (TES) or conduct a site-specific Toxicity Reduction Evaluation <br /> (TRE). <br /> A TES may be conducted in lieu of a TRE if the percent effect at 100 percent <br /> effluent is less than or equal to 50 percent. Determining the cause of toxicity can be <br /> challenging when the toxicity signal is low. Several Central Valley facilities with <br /> ATTACHMENT F- FACT SHEET F-35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.