Laserfiche WebLink
2020 ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT <br /> TEICHERT AGGREGATES AND GRANITE CONSTRUCTION <br /> VERNALIS AREA <br /> Contours of equal groundwater elevations prepared with data from the shallow network wells show that <br /> the general direction of groundwater flow during times of seasonally high-water levels was typically to <br /> the east-southeast and east.This includes the first monitoring event in spring 1994 with comparatively <br /> high-water levels (Figure 7)and the period of the highest historically recorded groundwater elevations <br /> in spring 1998 (Figure 8).The water level elevations in spring 2000 were relatively low compared to <br /> groundwater conditions observed in previous spring seasons, however, the predominant direction of <br /> flow was also to the east-southeast(Figure 9). In spring 2002, overall groundwater elevations were very <br /> similar to the spring 2000 elevations, but the groundwater flow direction was east-northeasterly as <br /> influenced by a relatively high groundwater level in the Koster irrigation well (Figure 10). <br /> The February 2020 (Figure 11) and November 2020 (Figure 12)groundwater elevation contour maps <br /> indicate easterly groundwater flow conditions. <br /> 3.2 Groundwater Quality <br /> The electrical conductivity(EC)of samples retrieved from the shallow network wells(Hall and Faulkner <br /> domestic wells) mostly ranged between 900 and 1,000 µS/cm between 1994 and the mid-2000's when <br /> EC values started to decrease until early 2014(Figure 13).The November 2014 EC measurement in the <br /> Faulkner well was the highest on record (1,130 µS/cm); Hall increased to 1,040 µS/cm. Since late 2015, <br /> EC decreased in both the Faulkner and Hall wells to values similar to early 2014. During 2020, EC in the <br /> Hall and Faulkner domestic wells were the lowest of the period of record (780 and 740 µS/cm, <br /> respectively).The EC of samples retrieved from the deep network wells South Tracy#1,#3, and Brown's <br /> New mainly range from 800 to 900µS/cm and have been very stable over the period of record.'The EC <br /> at Brown's#1 was more variable from 1994 until 2005 (when it was vandalized), and the EC at its <br /> replacement well (Granite#3; sampling commenced in 2006) was higher, but similarly variable prior to <br /> the well being replaced in 2019 with Granite#5. EC in Granite#5 ranged from 874 to 976 µS/cm in 2020, <br /> consistent with previous Granite#3 measurements. Groundwater quality data for 2020 are summarized <br /> in Table 3 and the complete water quality record is provided in Table 4. Laboratory reports and field <br /> notes are provided in Attachment 3. <br /> Time series plots of major cation concentrations (sodium, calcium, and magnesium) and anion <br /> concentrations(bicarbonate, chloride, and sulfate) prepared for the individual wells are consistent with <br /> the EC measurements and reflect stable hydrochemical groundwater conditions(Figures 14 to 22). <br /> Concentrations of major cations and anions were averaged over the period of record and plotted in <br /> milliequivalents per liter(meq/L) in a Schoeller Diagram (Figure 23). Calcium and sodium are the most <br /> prevalent cations in groundwater in both the shallow and deep zones. In the shallow zone (Hall and <br /> I The atypical electrical conductivity and associated elevated calcium,chloride,iron,and manganese concentrations in <br /> November 2017 are attributed to the rehabilitation work performed on this well in fall 2017,which included strong acid <br /> treatment. <br /> 3 In August 2009,a sample was retrieved from Granite#4 in lieu of Granite#3,where a sample could not be retrieved at the <br /> time. <br /> LUHDORFF&SCALMANINI <br /> CONSULTING ENGINEERS 6 <br />