Laserfiche WebLink
defend, and hold the County harmless from and against any claim or action by <br /> affected State or Federal agencies as to the project's compliance with said laws." <br /> The alternative mitigation measure is the some the same mitigation measure for the <br /> existing approved Vernalis Central application (Quarry Excavation Application No. QX-91- <br /> 5 of Teichert Aggregates). This application should include the some mitigation measures <br /> as the adjoining operation. It is necessary for Teichert Aggregates to have flexibility in <br /> mitigating any impacts with the understanding that it will comply with the State and <br /> Federal Endangered Species Act. <br /> In response to McGrew's comment letter, the EIR consultant, in cooperation with County staff, <br /> recommended that MM 4.3-2 read exactly as it had in Teichert's original Final EIR for QX 91-5. The Board <br /> of Supervisors certified the Final EIR with the original language intact. Later, however, when Teichert <br /> sought approval of a Quarry Excavation Application (No. PA-0500847), the Conditions of Approval <br /> (Condition 4(a)-(e) deleted the critical "or" language of MM 4.3-2, and directly required the applicant to <br /> pay the SJMSCP fees.This, of course, defeats the entire purpose behind MM 4.3-2, and makes a mockery <br /> of the notion that the SJMSCP is in fact a voluntary program. <br /> Subsequently, Quarry Excavation PA0500847 was approved by the San Joaquin County Planning <br /> Commission on September 6, 2007. KRC purchased a portion of the property covered by PAO500847 <br /> (known as the "Raspo Property") in 2015. At that time, KRC was advised by then-Director Kerry Sullivan <br /> to submit an Improvement Plan and to comply with all Mitigation Measures and Conditions of Approval <br /> prior to mining the Raspo Property. However, the proposed Condition of Approval for potential impacts <br /> to threatened and/or endangered species is not consistent with Mitigation Measure 4.3-2 of the Final EIR. <br /> Thus, KRC requests that Condition 4 be modified as follows: <br /> "Prior to site disturbance, the project proponent shall either(a)comply with the SJMSCP(including <br /> pre-construction special-status species surveys, and implementation of Incidental Take Minimization <br /> Measures)and pay appropriate mitigation fees as determined by the SJMSCP;OR,IN THE <br /> ALTERNATIVE, (b) in carrying out the operations of the Project, the applicant shall take no actions <br /> that violate the provisions of the State or Federal Endangered Species Acts or any regulations <br /> promulgated pursuant thereto. The applicant shall undertake pre-construction special-status species <br /> surveys, and implementation of Incidental Take Minimization Measures outlined in the SJMSCP. <br /> Compliance with the State or Federal Endangered Species Acts shall be the sole responsibility of the <br /> applicant, and the applicant agrees to indemnify, defend,and hold the County harmless from and <br /> against any claim or action by affected State or Federal Agencies as to the Project's compliance with <br /> said laws. Upon receipt of a fully executed indemnification agreement, and notification to authorized <br /> representatives of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br /> that the applicant has elected not to participate in the SJMSCP, the County shall issue grading and <br /> quarry excavation permits for the project." <br />