My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_1974-1999
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SANTA FE
>
23201
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0504223
>
CORRESPONDENCE_1974-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2023 2:33:30 PM
Creation date
3/31/2022 11:41:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1974-1999
RECORD_ID
PR0504223
PE
4430
FACILITY_ID
FA0006129
FACILITY_NAME
BILL LANE DUMP
STREET_NUMBER
23201
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
SANTA FE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ESCALON
Zip
95320
APN
249-060-14
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
23201 S SANTA FE RD
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
243
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 Health Division said groundwater in this area is 20 feet . Mr. <br /> 2 Padilla noted in the Activity/Action Log notes that water wells <br /> 3 in the City of Riverbank first groundwater is 63 feet . <br /> 4 On January 4, 1990, an Office Hearing was held. The <br /> 5 following were present at this hearing: Mr. Lane and two of his <br /> 6 lawyers; Thomas Sweeso from the County Valley Unified Air <br /> 7 Pollution Control District; David Irey, District Attorney; Jim <br /> 8 Miller and Ed Padilla from Public Health Services, Environmental <br /> 9 Health Division. The Pre-trial date was posted until January 1, <br /> 10 1990 . Mr. Irey told Bill Lane that all hazardous wastes and <br /> 11 refuse must be removed from the site, but the dirt could stay. <br /> 12 Concrete and asphalt was still questionable as whether it needed <br /> 13 to be removed. Mr. Sweeso said there may be drainage problems <br /> 14 due to large amounts of added material to the site . Mr. Padilla <br /> 15 pointed out there may be groundwater contamination and possible <br /> 16 landfill gas migration. Mr. Lane said he could not afford to <br /> 17 clean up the property; however, he did not deny that he received <br /> 18 gate fees of at least $12, 000 to dump at his illegal landfill . <br /> 19 On January 4 , 1991, Ed Padilla agreed to meet with Bill <br /> 20 Lane and his lawyers at the illegal dump site to evaluate the <br /> 21 clean-up process . <br /> 22 On January 15, 1991, a meeting was held with District <br /> 23 Attorney David Irey, Ed Padilla, Thomas Sweeso, Bill Lane and <br /> 24 his lawyers . It was agreed that no new evidence was admissible <br /> 25 for the Pre-trial . No new evidence or photographs were found <br /> 26 except for Mr. Lane' s lawyer. Mr. Irey asked for a report <br /> 27 stating what should be done on the clean-up at the Subject <br /> 28 <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.