SU0000263 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PC: 10-6-88 MS-89-5 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission deny the Minor Subdivision based on the inability to make Findings 1 and 2 . FINDINGS 1 . The proposed map is consistent with applicable General and Specific Plans. " The finding cannot be made because the proposal is contrary to provisions pertinent to the GA zone, which is the imple- tenting zone for the General Plan designation on of not meet Agriculture . Specifically, the app the minimum requirements for the creation of a homesite ri- parcel . The proposal is also inconsistent with agon of i cultural policies which discourage the fragmentation agricultural land. There are no applicable Specific Plans . 2 . "The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable General and Specific Plans . " This finding cannot be made because the proposed osed sedand does tion would further fragment agricultural property not meet the minimum requirements for the creation of a homesite parcel . There are no applicable Specific Plans. h sically suitable for the type of development . " 3 . "The site is p y This finding can be made because the parcel is large enough to accommodate all of the proposed facilities and improve- ments. 4 . "The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development . " This finding can be made because the site , as proposed, is ° adequately sized to accommodate all required on-site ser- vices. ro osed improvements 5 . "The design of toecausesubdivision substantialthe environmental damage or are not likely injure fish or wildlife or their substantially and avoidably E habitat . " can be made because an Initial Study prepared This finding rare or endangered for the project did not identify any an substantial , # species on the site , nor did it identify Y ` adverse environmental effects . -6-