SU0014917 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Item No. 5 PC : 10-6-88 MS-89-6 Page 1 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission deny the Minor Subdivision based on the inability to make Findings No . 1 , 2 , and 4 . FINDINGS 1 . "The proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in Section 65451 of the Subdivision Map Act . " ° This finding cannot be made because the proposal is contrary to the provisions of the GA-40 zone, which is the implementing zone for the General Plan. Specifically, the application does not meet the intent of provisions for creating a homesite parcel . The proposal also is not con- sistent with the agricultural policy of the General Plan which discourages further fragmentation of agricultural land. There are no applicable Specific Plans . 2 . "The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans . " ° This finding cannot be made because the applicant has failed to adequately demonstrate owner-operator status of the property. There are no applicable Specific Plans. 3 . "The site is physically suitable for the type of development . " ° This finding can be made because the parcel can accommodate all necessary facilities on-site . 4. "The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development . " ° This finding cannot be made because evidence indicates that the owner does not qualify as an owner-operator , and further fragmentation of the parcel will reduce the agri- cultural value of the property. 5 . "The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat . " This finding can be made because an Initial Study prepared for the project did not identify any rare or endangered