Laserfiche WebLink
2 <br />Hi Robert, <br />Do you want a grading specification to use as a guideline? <br /> <br />I think our solid waste clean up sections use one of the CalTrans specifications. I can confirm this for you if you want. <br />Please let me know <br />Thank you <br /> <br />Sabra <br /> <br />From: Young, Glenn@CalRecycle <br />Sent: Friday, August 02, 2019 9:36 AM <br />To: McClellon, Robert <RMcClellon@sjgov.org> <br />Cc: Ambrose, Sabra@CalRecycle <Sabra.Ambrose@CalRecycle.ca.gov>; Turkatte, Linda <LTurkatte@sjgov.org>; Foley, <br />Kasey <KFoley@sjgov.org>; Subbotnikova, Natalia <nsubbotnikova@sjgov.org>; Easter, Jesse <jeaster@sjgov.org> <br />Subject: Re: PNA 500 E. Louise Lathrop CA <br /> <br />Robert - I apologize - I am down in San Mateo (and Alameda County next week). I will try to give you a call <br />early next week. <br /> <br />The problem with the glass (with respect to visual - is that at many disposal sites - surface debris are visual <br />indicators of daylighted waste, surface disposal, etc. I would recommend that the consultant and contractor <br />clean-up and remove any surface debris remants over "documented" clean-closed areas. There are still areas <br />of disposal at the PNA site (power plant property), etc. If glass is in areas that have not been clean-closed - it <br />may represent daylighted waste (no cover) or surface debris. <br /> <br />We can discuss further next week. The clean-closure certification aspect of this site is problematic due to the <br />nature and history of disposal site operations at the site. The most conservative approach is to continue <br />inspections and require a waste excavation plan (which is already approved for the site). At this point - given <br />the disposal area under the power plant I don't think this site is ready to be archived or have inspection <br />frequencies reduced. <br /> <br />Glenn <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Glenn