Laserfiche WebLink
District CEQA Reference No: 20200052 Page 6 of 8 <br /> ii) The following policies/mitigation measures are recommended to mitigate <br /> potential health impacts of individual projects: <br /> (1) Development projects resulting in toxic air contaminant emissions will be <br /> located an adequate distance from residential areas and other sensitive <br /> receptors in accordance to ARB's Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A <br /> Community Health Perspective. <br /> (2) A health risk screening and/or assessment will be performed to assess <br /> potential risks to sensitive receptors for the following projects: <br /> (3) Projects whose proposed locations are within the established buffer <br /> distances identified in ARB's handbook; <br /> (4) Projects whose land uses are not specifically identified in ARB's handbook <br /> (such as shopping centers), but there is sufficient information to reasonably <br /> conclude that sensitive receptors would be exposed to significant sources <br /> of toxic air contaminants; and <br /> (5) Projects that would otherwise appear to be exempt from CEQA <br /> requirements, but there is sufficient information to reasonably conclude that <br /> sensitive receptors would be exposed to significant sources of toxic air <br /> contaminants, such as industrial use projects allowed by right. <br /> d) A discussion of whether the Project would result in a cumulatively considerable net <br /> increase of any criteria pollutant or precursor for which the San Joaquin Valley Air <br /> Basin is in non-attainment. More information on the District's attainment status <br /> can be found online by visiting the District's website at: <br /> http://valleyair.org/aginfo/attainment.htm. <br /> e) As required by the recent decision in Sierra Club v. County of Fresno (2018) 6 <br /> CalAt" 502, a reasonable effort to discuss relevant specifics regarding the <br /> connection between potential adverse air quality impacts from the Project with the <br /> likely nature and magnitude of potential health impacts. If the potential health <br /> impacts from the Project cannot be specifically correlated, explain what is known <br /> and why, given scientific constraints, potential health impacts cannot be translated. <br /> Planning Commission Staff Report 55 <br /> PA-1900240 (SA), PA-2000014 (ER), PA-2000019 (DA) <br /> Response Letters <br />