Laserfiche WebLink
MOUNTAIN HOUSE <br /> MASTER PLAN CONSISTENCY FINDINGS <br /> Project Action or <br /> Consis- Conditions o <br /> Section tency Approval <br /> 1 Heading# Title Text YIN/NA Finding of Fact/Analysis and.Evidence of Compliance (COA) <br /> Participation in Other Programs. Compliance with the <br /> measures set forth above also may be accomplished <br /> through implementation of the HMP described in <br /> Section 7.3.2: Habitat Management Plan (HMP),or <br /> participation(by payment of a fee or otherwise) in an <br /> adopted County-wide multi-species habitat <br /> conservation plan. Regardless, pre-construction raptor <br /> and burrowing owl surveys would still be required to <br /> protect active nests until young birds have (ledged <br /> Other Special- even if a developer participates in I IMP's or other <br /> 841 7.3.5.1.f Status Species conservation plans. Y See 11835 COA-32 <br /> The Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the <br /> project indicates that there are no federally protected <br /> wetlands on the project site. However,wetlands could <br /> be impacted by the off-site infrastructure <br /> improvements needed to support the Neighborhood. <br /> By incorporating condition BIO-4 contained in the <br /> Wetlands Mitigated Negative Declaration,this potential impact <br /> 842 7.3.6.0.a Management To preserve wetlands within Mountain House Y is reduced to less than significant. COA-34 <br /> Wetlands Development shall be carried out so that existing <br /> 843 7.3.6.P.a Management wetlands are preserved to the degree practicable. Y See#842 COA-34 <br /> Where development cannot practicably occur without <br /> Wetlands impacting wetlands,the development shall minimize <br /> 844 7.3.6.P.b Management impacts. Y See# 842 COA-34 <br /> Wetlands Where impacts are unavoidable,their loss shall be <br /> 845 7.3.6.P.c Management 1compensated through mitigation. Y See# 842 ICOA-34 <br /> 10/03/2000 MHMP.CHECKLIST-928 Page184 <br /> w <br />