Laserfiche WebLink
MOUNTAIN HOUSE <br /> MASTER PLAN CONSISTENCY FINDINGS <br /> Project r,� <br /> h Conditions o <br /> Consis- <br /> tencyM <br /> a Approval <br /> Section . <br /> 1 Heading# Title ". Text Y/N/NA Findingof Fact/Analysis and Evidence of Com liance '>(COA) <br /> The Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the <br /> proposed subdivision indicates that there will be a <br /> potentially significant impact from mobile noise <br /> sources. The Mitigated Negative Declaration <br /> identified several areas where sound walls should be <br /> constructed to reduce impacts to less than significant. <br /> The construction and placement of these walls will <br /> Y,as incorporated into the Conditions of Approval. (Figure <br /> Overall Mobile condition 5, Recommended Sound Walls contained in the <br /> 1 155 11.3.1.0.a Noise Impacts To mitigate noise from mobile sources. ed Mitigated Negative Declaration) COA-27 <br /> Berms,barriers,soundwalls,setbacks, landscaping,or <br /> some combination of these measures shall be used <br /> adjacent to transportation noise sources to reduce Y,as <br /> Overall Mobile indoor and outdoor noise exposure to acceptable condition <br /> 1156 1 1.3.I.P.a Noise Impacts levels. ed See# 1155 COA-27 <br /> Where excessive sound wall heights would be The wall requirement discussed in# 1 155 also <br /> Overall Mobile necessary,a combination of setbacks and berms or provides an increased setback alternative to <br /> 1157 1 1.3.I.P.b Noise Impacts sound walls shall be considered. Y constructing higher walls. None. <br /> Setbacks shall be used in conjunction with noise Y,as <br /> Overall Mobile barriers where necessary to achieve acceptable levels condition <br /> 1158 1 1.3.1.P.c INoise Impacts lof noise. I ed See# 1155 'COA-27 <br /> 1159 <br /> 10/03/2000 MHMP.CHECKLIST-928 Page248 <br /> M <br />