My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0014674
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
>
20043
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-00-03
>
SU0014674
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2022 4:34:36 PM
Creation date
6/16/2022 3:22:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0014674
PE
2600
FACILITY_NAME
SU-00-03
STREET_NUMBER
20043
STREET_NAME
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
STREET_TYPE
PKWY
City
TRACY
APN
20908020
ENTERED_DATE
12/21/2021 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
20043 MOUNTAIN HOUSE PKWY
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1021
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BRUEN &GORDON <br /> THOMAS M.BRUEN A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION TELEPHONE-. (925) 295-3131 <br /> FAC51MILE: (9Z5) 205-3132 <br /> SCOTr W. GORDON <br /> JOHN A. BURKE 1990 NORTH CALIFORNIA BOULEVARD SCiVROON BgUi.OR.COM <br /> 5URE 9.40 <br /> WALNUT CRFFK. CAI IFORNIA 94596 <br /> October 5,2000 <br /> t � <br /> I <br /> _ I <br /> Via Facsimile and U.S. Mail <br /> Ms. Sandra Carter, Chairperson <br /> And Members of the Planning Coninussion OCT - 5 2000 <br /> San Joaquin County Planning Commission Cpmmunr <br /> 1801 E. Hazelton Avenue Cp'�EIOpmQnt f�Qpfi <br /> Stockton, California 95205 <br /> Re: Mountain House; Tri-Mark Communities Application for Major Subdivision <br /> App.No. SU-00-3 f <br /> Dear Chair Carter and Members of the Commission: <br /> I am writing on behalf of my client, Alameda County,in connection with the Trimark <br /> Communities application for a Major Subdivision ("the Trimark Project"or"Project"). We <br /> respectfully request that your Commission continue this matter to address the serious concerns <br /> raised herein, and to afford us adequate time to review the Project materials before you. 1 <br /> received notice of this hearing by mail on Monday,October 2,2000 (notice dated September 29, <br /> 2000) and just yesterday I received a two(2)inch packet of revisions and supplements to the <br /> staff report and analysis of the Project,which 1 have not had the opportunity to review. Clearly <br /> we have not been afforded sufficient time to review these materials in anticipation of your <br /> meeting. it would appear that you and other Commission members would not have had adequate <br /> time to review the voluminous materials I just received yesterday. <br /> For the reasons we have previously stated to the Board of Supervisors when it considered <br /> a Negative Declaration for the Project on September 12,2000 and as further set forth herein, the <br /> proposed action before your Commission both violates the provisions of the California <br /> Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the 1993 Memorandum of Understanding("MOU") <br /> between Alameda and San Joaquin counties relative to processing entitlements for the Project-' i <br /> objections to the proposed Project: <br /> Specifically, Alameda county has the following � P P F <br /> 'We incorporate by reference as though fully sct forth herein our prior letters to the CSD an <br /> Board of Supervisors on the Project issues, dated August 22, September 5, Septemberl2 an <br /> September 22.2000. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.