My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0014674
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
>
20043
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-00-03
>
SU0014674
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2022 4:34:36 PM
Creation date
6/16/2022 3:22:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0014674
PE
2600
FACILITY_NAME
SU-00-03
STREET_NUMBER
20043
STREET_NAME
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
STREET_TYPE
PKWY
City
TRACY
APN
20908020
ENTERED_DATE
12/21/2021 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
20043 MOUNTAIN HOUSE PKWY
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1021
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Residential Population Forecast. Using the same assumed population estimates as those used in <br /> the 1994 Environmental Impact Report(EIR) on the Mountain House Specific Plan 1 (San Joaquin <br /> County, 1994), the proposed residential development of this project would result in an on-site <br /> population of 3,980 persons (see Table 5). <br /> Table 5 <br /> PROJECTED RESIDENTIAL POPULATION <br /> Persons Per <br /> Land Use Dwelling Units Unit Total Population <br /> Low-Density Residential 598 3.12 1 1,866 <br /> Med. Density Residential 380 2.7 1,026 <br /> High Density Residential 480a 2.0 1 960 <br /> Second Units i 64 2.0 128 <br /> TOTAL1,522b 3,980 <br /> a Assumes a density of 20 units per acre for the proposed 24 acres. <br /> b Does not include any density bonus units allowable for high density area. <br /> 4. Commercial and Industrial Portion of Development <br /> The proposed commercial development would include the following categories: 1) Neighborhood <br /> Commercial (2.6 acres); 2) Community Commercial (17.8 acres); and 3) Office Commercial (30.5 <br /> acres). The 2.6-acre neighborhood commercial use would be concentrated in one area at the <br /> center of the project site, at the intersection of De Anza Boulevard and Wicklund Crossing (see <br /> Figure 2). Allowable uses within this area would include uses such as eating establishments, <br /> child care centers, retail sales, medical services, public services, and religious assembly. <br /> Although a larger 2.6-acre site is zoned for Neighborhood Commercial, only 1.0 acres would be <br /> developed with neighborhood commercial uses. The remaining 1.6 acres of the site would be <br /> developed with a neighborhood recreation facility (pool, etc.)for residents' use. Maximum building <br /> coverage for this zone could be 60 percent, or 66,908 sq.ft. for this 2.6-acre area if buildings were <br /> one-story, or 133,816 sq.ft. if the buildings were the maximum allowable height of two stories. <br /> Industrial areas would include 10 lots for Limited Industrial uses on about 35 acres. These lots <br /> would be accessible from the proposed De Anza Boulevard and smaller east-west streets. <br /> Though they would be located adjacent to Mountain House Parkway (see Figure 4), they would <br /> not be accessed from this arterial. <br /> Job generation from the proposed industrial and commercial development would be 3032 persons <br /> (see Table 6). Assuming 1.44 workers per household,' the resulting jobs/housing ratio at the <br /> project site at buildout would be 1.43 (3032 employed persons divided by [1522 housing units X <br /> 1.44 workers per household]), significantly higher than the 0.99 ratio anticipated for the buildout of <br /> the entire new community. By the time the 1.43 ratio is met, other residential units outside of <br /> Neighborhood "F" are likely to be on line in other residential areas. The absorption rate for the <br /> ' San Joaquin Count% had a ratio of onh I._'I jobs per household according to the 1990 U.S. Census: <br /> ho%%ever,the ratio should rise as the Counts continues to urbanise. The Cit% of Trace measured 1.41 %%orkers per <br /> household and Alameda Count% had a ratio of 1 54 tohs per household. The projected%%orkers per household ratio for <br /> the project at buildout is based on a regression anal%%i,prepared b% the applicant's consultants([)a%id Taussig K <br /> Associates. 1994a). <br /> -S- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.