My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0014674
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
>
20043
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-00-03
>
SU0014674
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2022 4:34:36 PM
Creation date
6/16/2022 3:22:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0014674
PE
2600
FACILITY_NAME
SU-00-03
STREET_NUMBER
20043
STREET_NAME
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
STREET_TYPE
PKWY
City
TRACY
APN
20908020
ENTERED_DATE
12/21/2021 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
20043 MOUNTAIN HOUSE PKWY
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1021
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MOUNTAIN HOUSE NEIGHBORHOOD' 'PROJECT INITIAL STUDY <br /> even under existing conditions, cannot handle all of the runoff. The project applicant has proposed <br /> interim measures to be taken to handle the increased runoff from the project development. These <br /> measures include diversion berms and channels as well as mobile rented pumps. Refer to Condition of <br /> Approval HYDRO-2 regarding an interim storm water pumping plan which would mitigate any potential <br /> impacts related to drainage system capacity. Refer to Condition of Approval HYDRO-1 and HYDRO-3 <br /> regarding measures to minimize polluted runoff. <br /> fi Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? <br /> There has been no known water quality monitoring of runoff from the project site or vicinity. Given the <br /> current land use of the project site, open grassland and agricultural area and the soil and topography <br /> characteristics, the non-point source pollutants likely found in runoff from the site are sediment, nutrients, <br /> pathogens, and oxygen-demanding solids. Non-point source pollution consists of materials and chemicals <br /> that are washed from diffuse locations within a watershed and washed into a storm drainage network. Due <br /> to variable land area, soil conditions, vegetative cover, and agricultural practices, however, it is difficult to <br /> estimate pollutant concentrations. <br /> Conversion of the site from agricultural use to a suburban development would increase the levels of oil <br /> and grease, petroleum hydrocarbons, and metals, entering the Old River channel and ultimately the San <br /> Joaquin River Delta. Pollutants from the proposed project would be consistent with typical suburban non- <br /> point source pollution. Suburban non-point source pollutants come from a variety of sources including <br /> household products and home maintenance supplies, landscape materials and products(pesticides, <br /> herbicides, and fertilizers), automobiles, and fuels. The pollutants of primary concern for the proposed <br /> project include fertilizers and pesticides from landscaped areas and oil, grease, and petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons from automobiles and fuels. <br /> The project's Master Storm Water Plan and Neighborhood F Storm Water Report proposes post- <br /> construction storm water pollution prevention best management practices(BMPs)including first-flush <br /> water quality basins. Other programs such as regular street sweeping, inlet stenciling, and home buyer <br /> education are not specifically mentioned. Due to the change in land use and the size of the development, <br /> the anticipated pollutant loads would likely be substantial. <br /> Construction site erosion could be another impact to water quality. Site grading during construction could <br /> significantly increase erosion on the site(discussed above)and represents a potential impact to water <br /> quality. Refer to Conditions of Approval HYDRO-1 and HYDRO-3 regarding measures to minimize <br /> polluted runoff. <br /> g) Place housing within a 100 year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood <br /> Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? <br /> The project would not place housing within any official designated Flood Hazard Zone. However, a series <br /> of berms would be placed or heightened along portions of Mountain House Creek to increase the amount <br /> of freeboard between the 100-year flood elevation and the top of the berm. In many cases this freeboard <br /> is between 1 and 2 feet. Current Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA)guidelines require 3 <br /> feet of freeboard on a levee or berm to be certified safe from breaching. If the structure does not have <br /> three feet of freeboard, the floodplain area is mapped assuming the levee fails. Under this scenario, it is <br /> likely that a portion of the 100-year flood flow would spill from the Mountain House Creek channel and <br /> flow towards Neighborhood"I"'. In theory, the proposed ditchlberm along the Central Parkway alignment <br /> would capture these flows and return them to Mountain House Creek. However, if that ditch/berm system <br /> is not designed with the appropriate freeboard, it would not be recognized as a regulatory levee. <br /> C:U0B=C\1NMAL MMYONALINMALMDY-PARMDOC(7(!7100) 99 V.J. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALrrY <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.