My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0015006
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
R
>
ROBINDALE
>
2760
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-2200120
>
SU0015006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2023 3:16:22 PM
Creation date
6/16/2022 4:29:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0015006
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
PA-2200120
STREET_NUMBER
2760
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
ROBINDALE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205-
APN
11924007
ENTERED_DATE
6/16/2022 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
2760 E ROBINDALE AVE
RECEIVED_DATE
6/13/2022 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FINDINGS FOR MINOR SUBDIVISION <br /> PA-2200120 <br /> CSRP LLC/TONY GHIO <br /> 1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan, any applicable Master Plan, Specific <br /> Plan, and Special Purpose Plan and any other applicable plan adopted by the County. <br /> • Minor Subdivision No. PA-2200120 is consistent with the General Plan because the R-L(Low <br /> Density Residential)zoning of the subject parcel permits the division proposed and the R-L <br /> zoning is an implementing zone for the parcel's R/L (Low Density Residential) land use <br /> designation. Further, no Master Plan, Specific Plan, or Special Purpose Plan are applicable <br /> to Minor Subdivision No. PA-2200120. <br /> 2. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan and any <br /> applicable Specific Plan or Special Purpose Plan. <br /> • The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan <br /> and any applicable Specific Plan or Special Purpose Plan because the design and <br /> improvements meet the minimum standards contained in the General Plan as reflected in <br /> the Tentative Map. <br /> 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. <br /> • -No development is proposed with this subdivision application. The site is physically <br /> suitable for the type of subdivision proposed because all requirements contained in the <br /> Development Title and all minimum County standards can be met. <br /> 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. <br /> • The subdivision application does not propose any development. The resulting parcels are <br /> physically suitable to meet density requirements for any future development. <br /> 5. Neither the design of the subdivision nor any proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial <br /> environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure-fish or wildlife or their habitat. <br /> • The subdivision application does not propose any development or improvements,therefore, <br /> the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and <br /> avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. <br /> 6. The design of the subdivision or type of improvement is not likely to-cause significant public health <br /> problems. <br /> • The subdivision application does not propose any development or improvements,therefore, <br /> the design of the subdivision is not likely to cause significant public health problems. <br /> 7. The design of the subdivision or the types of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired <br /> by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. <br /> • The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large <br /> for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision because, if it is <br /> found that alternate easements for access or for use are necessary, these will be <br /> substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. <br /> PA-2200120— Findings 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.