Laserfiche WebLink
The possibility still exists that very shallow wells (<100 ft in depth with a pump set high in <br /> elevation) in the Valpico Section locale may be affected by this recharge volume removal. It must <br /> be recognized,however,that the proposed housing development will also provide an indeterminable <br /> volume of recharge from domestic irrigation,wastewater treatment percolation ponds,on-site septic <br /> systems and stormwater runoff ponds. <br /> POTENTIAL DRAWDOWN EFFECTS <br /> The only well that may be affected by drawdown created from the CSA-44A well is the Fairoaks <br /> well-CSA-44 No.2,since it is also screened in the lower zone. Bookman-Edmonston Engineering <br /> completed a Theis Analysis for a Single Pumping Well(See pg.6-17). The Theis equation was used <br /> to evaluate drawdown for a well pumping 1,500 gallons per minute which is similar to the <br /> production rate for the City of Tracy wells, and may be applicable for CSA-44A. Figure 25 in the <br /> Bookman-Edmonston Report illustrates the drawdown at various distances from the pumping well. <br /> The data in this Figure was used to determine possible influence to the Fairoaks wells from the CSA- <br /> 44A well. The Fairoaks well is approximately 1,250 feet from CSA-44A. Interpolating the distance <br /> (1,250 ft) from the pumping well (CSA-44A), it is determined from this graph that the drawdown <br /> would be 22.5 feet at the Fairoaks well, after 365 days of pumping at 1,500 gpm. From the well <br /> schematic for the Fairoaks well located in the Appendices,the upper well screen is located 486 feet <br /> bgs or-368 feet MSL. The standing water level was measured in July 1998 and found to be 158 ft <br /> bgs (40 ft MSL). Therefore, the drawdown effect from the CSA-44A well should not influence <br /> production from the Fairoaks well. <br /> Additional data was obtained from Groundwater and Wells' to illustrate the potential for well <br /> interference. The Table below shows interference in wells at the referenced distances from a <br /> production well. The time of pumping for this data was 7 days with a calculated well yield of 1,000 <br /> gpm. These numbers are correct when all of the assumptions for the Theis equations are satisfied <br /> and offer an approximate guide to anticipated drawdowns. <br /> Aquifer Transmissivity Drawdown Drawdown Drawdown Drawdown Drawdown <br /> Type gpd/ft in at 100 ft at 500 ft at 1,000 ft at 10,000 ft <br /> Production <br /> Well ft ft ft ft <br /> Unconfined 100,000 16.7 6.1 2.4 0.9 0 <br /> 50,000 31.8 10.7 3.3 0.1 <br /> 7 0 <br /> 25,000 60.4 18.2 3.4 0 0 <br /> Confined 100,000 22.8 12.2 8.5 6.9 1.6 <br /> 50,000 43.9 22.8 15.4 L.3 1 .7 <br /> 25,000 1 84.7 j 42.5 j 27.7 21.3 0.2 <br /> Page -5- <br /> Vaffey Ag Research <br />