Laserfiche WebLink
S = Sufficient <br />❑ <br />= Insufficient <br />Site map showing the location, with concise and accurate dimensions of the percolation test holes on the parcel. <br />S <br />I <br />5.0 SOIL PROFILE INFORMATION SECTION <br />❑-" <br />❑ <br />5.1 Site map showing the location, with dimensions, of the soil profile pit on the parcel. <br />P❑ <br />Description of the date, time and protocol used to prepare the test hole, including depth and dimensions of hole, <br />5.2 Description of soil profile pit including depth and dimensions. <br />P, <br />❑ <br />5.3 Description of soil lithology as noted from test pit by appropriate professional using industry standard protocol. <br />❑ <br />5.4 Discussion of soil lithology as related to future onsite septic uses. <br />Description of the date, time and condition of the test hole after the 24-hour soak period (hole still intact, hole dry, <br />6.0 PERCOLATION TEST INFORMATION SECTION <br />�] <br />❑ <br />6.1 <br />Site map showing the location, with concise and accurate dimensions of the percolation test holes on the parcel. <br />❑ <br />6.2 <br />The minimum number of shallow and deep percolation tests was performed for each parcel. <br />❑ <br />6.3 <br />Description of the date, time and protocol used to prepare the test hole, including depth and dimensions of hole, <br />preparation of hole, and depth of water used to presoak (minimum 12 inches). <br />❑ <br />6.4 <br />Description of the date, time and condition of the test hole after the 24-hour soak period (hole still intact, hole dry, <br />depth to water remaining in hole, etc.) <br />(LJ <br />❑ <br />6.5 <br />The test conformed to SJC Policy EHD 02-02 (correct depth, diameter, 2" gravel, 6" water refill, correct readings <br />recorded). <br />❑ <br />6.6 <br />Complete Percolation Test Form (including readings) was provided with REHS verification signature. The rate <br />was correctly calculated using the last reading. <br />❑ 6.7 Discussion of any potential problems predicted and/or the need for an engineered or alternative septic system. <br />❑ 6.8 Discussion of percolation rates in relation to the type, size and location of future leach fields needed at the site. <br />7.0 CONCLUSION SECTION <br />❑ ❑ 7.1 The report was signed and stamped by the appropriately registered individual <br />Reviewed By: <br />Reviewed Date: <br />0 I k� <br />EHD 26-03 Page 2 of 3 SOIL SUITABILITY STUDY CKLST <br />4/24/12 <br />