My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_2000
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SANTA FE
>
23023
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0504907
>
CORRESPONDENCE_2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2022 1:50:54 PM
Creation date
8/24/2022 10:19:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2000
RECORD_ID
PR0504907
PE
4430
FACILITY_ID
FA0006398
FACILITY_NAME
SNYDERS SANITARY
STREET_NUMBER
23023
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
SANTA FE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ESCALON
Zip
95320
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
23023 S SANTA FE RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Somewhere, at some level above Robert Mc Clellon, someone will put some <br /> beginning of sense to this standoff. We plan on taking one step at a time until we find the <br /> person willing to use common sense. The property was an eyesore and problem for the <br /> last 40 years. We have 2/3 cleaned up the property, and a very large number of people <br /> have noted the change. All work was stopped on August 4, 2000 at 11:55 a.m. when <br /> Robert McClellon rescinded all agreements for the test trenches. The local motorcycle <br /> riders have returned to the property, cutting down our repaired fences. They have begun <br /> recreating a heavy dust source. Next will be the return of trash dumping by anyone and <br /> everyone, as was happening over the years. We know, as we hauled off tons of trash to <br /> Lovelace Transfer site and to the scrappers in July 2000. Who at San Joaquin County <br /> wants this to happen and is willing to answer publicly that they returned this property to <br /> an eyesore and hazard? <br /> We bought this property from San Joaquin County with only a very casual <br /> comment at the very last minute of a"possible" problem. A preplanned major landfill <br /> being moved does not fit the word"possible" problem. The health department was in <br /> attendance at the auction but did not correct the"possible" statement. Entrapment of the <br /> purchaser will not work. A two hundred thousand dollar($200,000.00) removal plan on <br /> 10 acres demanded of us will only lead to a large public battle. If not corrected, an <br /> expensive legal battle will ensue. <br /> We purchased this property from San Joaquin County. The deed says seller: San <br /> Joaquin County. <br /> We have mostly cleared the property for the first time in forty years. Now we are <br /> blocked from further cleanup. We are threatened with actions from San Joaquin <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.