My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_2001-2002
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SANTA FE
>
23023
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0504907
>
CORRESPONDENCE_2001-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2023 2:42:48 PM
Creation date
8/24/2022 11:19:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2001-2002
RECORD_ID
PR0504907
PE
4430
FACILITY_ID
FA0006398
FACILITY_NAME
SNYDERS SANITARY
STREET_NUMBER
23023
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
SANTA FE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ESCALON
Zip
95320
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
23023 S SANTA FE RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
267
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
} <br /> 1 � <br /> 1 26. Declaratory relief is proper because DELTA FUNDING is seeking a <br /> 2 declaration of its rights and duties with respect to the Lynch Property. <br /> 3 27. A present and actual controversy, relating to the legal rights and duties of <br /> 4 the parties with respect to the Lynch Property, exists between DELTA FUNDING and SJPHS- <br /> 5 EHD. DELTA FUNDING contends that it is not liable for hazardous wastes on the Lynch <br /> 6 Property by virtue of the lender liability rule. DELTA FUNDING is informed and believes, <br /> and on that basis alleges,that SJPHS-EHD contends to the contrary in some or all respects. <br /> 7 TMRD CAUSE OF ACTION <br /> 8 (Intentional Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage) <br /> 9 <br /> 10 28. The allegations of paragraphs 1 through 27, inclusive, are hereby <br /> 11 incorporated as though fully set forth herein. <br /> 12 29. SJPHS-EHD employees knowingly and intentionally interfered with <br /> 13 DELTA FUNDING's attempts to sell the Lynch Property to prospective buyers. The sale of <br /> 14 the Lynch Property to any of these buyers would have been an economic benefit to DELTA <br /> 15 FUNDING. SJPHS-EHD employees knew about these potential sales and intentionally and <br /> maliciously acted in a manner designed to interfere with the sales. Specifically, DELTA <br /> 16 <br /> FUNDING is informed and believes and on that basis alleges that SJPHS-EHD employees <br /> 17 <br /> knowingly and intentionally, and without basis there for, made derogatory and misleading <br /> 18 statements to prospective buyers regarding DELTA FUNDING's and/or any subsequent <br /> 19 buyer's obligations,and liability for alleged subsurface conditions at the Lynch Property. <br /> 20 DELTA FUNDING is also informed and believes and based thereon alleges that SJPHS-EHD <br /> 21 also failed and refused to provide information concerning the property's regulatory status to <br /> 22 prospective buyers. SJPHS-EHD employees knew or should have known that their <br /> 23 statements and failure and refusal to provide information regarding the property's status <br /> 24 would dissuade prospective buyers from purchasing the property, including All Valley. <br /> 25 30. On or about January 3, 2001, All Valley and DELTA FUNDING <br /> 26 entered into a contract for the sale and purchase of the Lynch Property. The sale was subject <br /> to All Valley being granted 90 days for a feasibility study and possible cleanup and approval <br /> 27 <br /> from San Joaquin County officials and regulations within that period of time. All Valley's <br /> 28 <br /> 7 <br /> COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND DAMAGES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.