My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0015099
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FREDERICK
>
22770
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-2200165
>
SU0015099
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/22/2022 9:57:04 AM
Creation date
9/6/2022 1:58:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0015099
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
PA-2200165
STREET_NUMBER
22770
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
FREDERICK
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
RIPON
Zip
95366-
APN
22813027, -28, -29
ENTERED_DATE
8/16/2022 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
22770 S FREDERICK AVE
RECEIVED_DATE
9/1/2022 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\lsauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FINDINGS FOR MINOR SUBDIVISION <br /> PA-2200165 <br /> DALE R.& EILEEN J. KUIL TRUST/QUARTAROLI&ASSOCIATES, INC. <br /> 1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan, any applicable Master Plan, Specific <br /> Plan, and Special Purpose Plan and any other applicable plan adopted by the County. <br /> • Minor Subdivision No. PA-2200165 is consistent with the General Plan because the AG-40 <br /> (General Agriculture —40-acre minimum) zoning of the subject parcel permits the division <br /> proposed and the AG-40 zoning is an implementing zone for the parcel's A/G (General <br /> Agriculture)land use designation.Further,no Master Plan,Specific Plan,or Special Purpose <br /> Plan are applicable to Minor Subdivision No. PA-2200165. <br /> 2. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan and any <br /> applicable Specific Plan or Special Purpose Plan. <br /> • The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan <br /> and any applicable Specific Plan or Special Purpose Plan because the design and <br /> improvements meet the minimum standards contained in the General Plan as reflected in <br /> the Tentative Map. <br /> 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. <br /> • The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed because all <br /> development requirements contained in the Development Title and all minimum County <br /> standards are met. <br /> 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. <br /> • The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development because the number <br /> of parcels proposed is consistent with the AIG General Plan density. <br /> 5. Neither the design of the subdivision nor any proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial <br /> environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. <br /> • The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause <br /> substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or <br /> their habitat because any future development is subject to participation in the San Joaquin <br /> County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan to mitigate for any <br /> possible damage to wildlife or habitat. <br /> 6. The design of the subdivision or type of improvement is not likely to cause significant public health <br /> problems. <br /> • The design of the subdivision or the type of development is not likely to cause serious public <br /> health problems because any conditions attached to the approval will address any potential <br /> public health problems. <br /> 7. The design of the subdivision or the types of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired <br /> by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. <br /> • The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements <br /> acquired by the public at large for access through or use of the property within the proposed <br /> subdivision because, if it is found that alternate easements for access or for use are <br /> necessary,these will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. <br /> PA-2200165— Findings 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.