Laserfiche WebLink
. STRrE OF CALIFORNIA — ENVIRONMENTAL PROM ION AGENCY <br />.CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CO <br />CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br />3443 ROUTIER ROAD, SUITE A <br />SACRAMENTO, CA 95827-3098 <br />PHONE: (916) 255-3000 <br />FAX: (916) 255-3015 <br />Ms. Carrie Cummings <br />Forward Inc. <br />P. O. Box 6336 <br />Stockton, CA 95206 <br />• <br />NTF L BOARD— <br />a�VIRGAJIMENTAL HEALTH <br />PF �YII SRRVICE <br />93 JUL III pH 2: 22 <br />FORWARD LANDFILL, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY (Case No. 2209) <br />12 July 1993 <br />We have reviewed the Eastern Ash Pit Extension Construction Quality Assurance (CQA) Report <br />submitted by CH2M Hill on 22 June 1993. The report documented construction of the 80 -foot <br />western expansion of the Ash Pit (waste management unit E) including the western side wall liner. <br />The report provided CQA information and a construction certification as required by the facility's <br />waste discharge requirements (WDRs). <br />The report noted two significant problems encountered during construction of the unit. Several lab <br />permeability measurements on the clay liner failed to meet the criteria specified in the CQA plan. <br />Sample collection and testing procedures were suspected as a cause of the failing tests. However, <br />we also suspect the low plasticity index for soils used in the areas of the failing tests may have <br />contributed to the higher permeabilities. The CQA specifications and soil acceptance criteria should <br />be reevaluated in light of the Ash Pit experience. <br />The second problem involved geosynthetic materials used in construction. Phillips Fibers <br />Corporation factory identification numbers were removed from the geosynthetic rolls by the local <br />supplier before the rolls were delivered to Forward. The identification numbers were traced back <br />to the supplier and the issue was satisfactorily resolved prior to installation. However, the local <br />supplier's practice of removing the factory numbers prior to shipment to the construction site is not <br />appropriate and should not be tolerated in future construction projects. The identification numbers <br />link the manufacturer's certification to the rolls delivered to the site. If these numbers are removed <br />prior to delivery, then the CQA protocol is violated and the material should be rejected. if low <br />permeability geosynthetic liner material had been involved in this episode rather than filter fabric, <br />we would not approve its use in the liner. You should review your contract specifications and <br />implement any changes necessary to prevent this situation from happening again. <br />Based on the CH2M Hill report and certification, plus our inspection of the unit on 17 May 1993, <br />we approve the Ash Pit for waste discharge in accordance with the facility's WDRs. If you have <br />any questions, please call Steve Rosenbaum at (916) 255-3131. <br />v <br />WILLIAM J. MARSHALL, Chief <br />Chapter 15 Unit <br />SER <br />