Laserfiche WebLink
Geosyntec <br /> consultants <br /> 3. GROUNDWATER DATA GAPS <br /> The work conducted at RRI between 2018 and 2021 in accordance with the 2018 GMWP and <br /> addendums was designed to address the groundwater data gaps identified at RRI. This section <br /> describes outstanding data gaps that remain in the Site 3, Site 4, and Central Areas following <br /> completion of the data gaps investigation work through 2021. Data gaps related to the Landfill <br /> Area will be addressed following completion of the soil remedy and soda ash terminal <br /> construction activities; therefore, outstanding data gaps in the Landfill Area are not discussed in <br /> this 2022 GMAT. <br /> 3.1 Site 3 <br /> The monitoring wells located to the west of the former source areas at Site 3 were either unable <br /> to be located(W-102) or found to be damaged(W-025, W-211, W-096) during the well locating <br /> field activities conducted between 2018 and 2021 (Figure 4). As a result,the current cross- <br /> gradient lateral extent of VOCs in groundwater to the west of the former source areas at Site 3 <br /> remains a data gap. <br /> The grab-groundwater sample collected as part of the data gaps investigation at location <br /> GGW-25 in 2020 adjacent to the former burn pit from 85 to 90 feet bgs was reported with a VC <br /> concentration of 2.5 µg/L, which is above the MCL and DTSC Tap Water screening criteria. Per <br /> the ESCA, the Navy retains responsibility below 90 feet bgs at RRI; therefore,the vertical extent <br /> of VOCs at Site 3 is a remaining data gap that would need to be addressed by the Navy. <br /> The detection of dioxins and furans at Site 3 was inconsistent between the 2020 and 2021 <br /> monitoring events. In the 2020 monitoring event, dioxins and furans were detected in several <br /> wells where dioxins and furans were not detected in 2021. Due the inconsistency between the <br /> 2020 and 2021 groundwater sampling results,whether or not dioxins and furans are a COC in <br /> groundwater at Site 3 remains a data gap. <br /> Other groundwater data gaps previously identified for Site 3 have been addressed by the <br /> sampling conducted between 2018 and 2021. Metals were not identified as a potential COC for <br /> Site 3 in the Consent Agreement based on the historical site activities and historical Navy <br /> sampling at Site 3. Metals will be evaluated to determine if they are a groundwater COC at sites <br /> at RRI through the Work Plan to Evaluate Background Concentrations in Groundwater <br /> (Geosyntec, 2021 c). Once the three outstanding data gaps listed above have been addressed, the <br /> characterization of Site 3 groundwater will be adequate to proceed to the next step of a remedial <br /> investigation and feasibility study(RDFS). <br /> 3.2 Site 4 <br /> Grab-groundwater sampling conducted at Site 4 in 2019 defined the vertical and lateral extent of <br /> VOCs in groundwater. Following completion of the grab-groundwater sampling, a new <br /> monitoring well cluster(W-332 and W-333)was installed in 2020 to monitor the cross-gradient <br /> lateral and vertical extent of VOCs in groundwater to the west of the former source area. The <br /> concentrations of cis-1,2-DCE and VC have exceeded the MCLS or DTSC Tap Water screening <br /> criteria in the new monitoring well cluster. Therefore, monitoring of the lateral extent of VOCs <br /> in groundwater west of the former source area at Site 4 remains a data gap. <br /> RRI Groundwater Monitoring Work Plan 15 June 2022 <br />