My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0085988
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LEADSTONE
>
24363
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0085988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/28/2022 3:21:10 PM
Creation date
11/28/2022 2:15:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SR0085988
PE
2602
FACILITY_NAME
WOLF PROPERTY
STREET_NUMBER
24363
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
LEADSTONE
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
ACAMPO
Zip
95220
APN
00536002
ENTERED_DATE
11/3/2022 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
24363 N LEADSTONE DR
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\lsauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
S = Sufficient <br /> I = Insufficient <br /> S I 6.0 PERCOLATION TEST INFORMATION SECTION <br /> W ❑ 6.1 Site map showing the location,with concise and accurate dimensions of the percolation test holes on the parcel. <br /> ❑ 6.2 The minimum number of shallow and deep percolation tests was performed for each parcel. <br /> n1 ❑ 6.3 Description of the date, time and protocol used to prepare the test hole, including depth and dimensions of hole, <br /> preparation of hole, and depth of water used to presoak(minimum 12 inches). <br /> Q ❑ 6.4 Description of the date,time and condition of the test hole after the 24-hour soak period (hole still intact, hole dry, <br /> depth to water remaining in hole, etc.) <br /> ❑ 6.5 The test conformed to SJC Policy EHD 02-02(correct depth, diameter,2"gravel, 6"water refill, correct readings <br /> recorded). <br /> 2 ❑ 6.6 Complete Percolation Test Form (including readings)was provided with REHS verification signature. The rate <br /> was correctly calculated using the last reading. <br /> [r ❑ 6.7 Discussion of any potential problems predicted and/or the need for an engineered or alternative septic system. <br /> [y ❑ 6.8 Discussion of percolation rates in relation to the type, size and location of future leach fields needed at the site. <br /> 7.0 CONCLUSION SECTION <br /> E� ❑ 7.1 The report was signed and stamped by the appropriately registered individual <br /> Reviewed By: Nkat '10—A i O9 Reviewed Date: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.