Laserfiche WebLink
1986. Prior to sampling, each well was bailed to remove a volume of water <br />equal to five well volumes. The sample was then collected and filtered <br />through a #42 Whatman Filter paper to remove suspended solids. The sample <br />was split, and half of each sample was fixed with nitric acid to preserve <br />the metal. ions. Analyses of the groundwater samples are attached. <br />Elevations of the water in the monitoring wells in feet below mean sea <br />level are as follows: <br />MW -2 25.26 <br />MW -7 24.25 <br />MW -10 22.03 <br />MW -11 22.53 <br />MW -12 22.97 <br />MW -13 7.93 <br />MW -14 23.23 <br />Mw -16 23.70 <br />No data is available for MW -9 for the second quarter. Water Level data and <br />chemical data from MW -9 will be available for the third quarter. The water <br />level in well MW -13 is anomolously high. This measurement is being <br />re -checked. Water level readings will be taken on all existing wells <br />during the re -check of MW -13. This data will be transmitted to your office <br />when available. <br />These sampling methods and subsequent analyses are in conformance with <br />`Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater'. Analyses <br />were performed by California Water Labs of Modesto, California, a water <br />laboratory certified by the California Department of Health Services. <br />We apologize for any inconvenience caused by our late submittal. If you <br />have any questions regarding the contents of this report, please call. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />BETA ASSOCIATES <br />Jack E. McCollough <br />Registered Geologist #1559 <br />Certified Engineering Geologist: #905 <br />Attachments <br />cc: Mr. Greg Basso, Forward, Inc. <br />Mr. James Stahler, State Department of Health Services <br />Mr. Lee IIall, San Joaquin Local Health District <br />Mr. .John Stovall, Neumill.er and Beardslee <br />Mr. Tom Horton, San Joaquin County Department of Public Works <br />GBetav4ssociates <br />