My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0087014_SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CARROLTON
>
18163
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0087014_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2024 9:12:12 AM
Creation date
8/17/2023 1:11:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0087014
PE
2602
STREET_NUMBER
18163
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
CARROLTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
RIPON
Zip
95366
APN
24538026
ENTERED_DATE
8/1/2023 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
18163 S CARROLTON RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
353
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
California Water Today 101 <br /> For this reason,many ecosystem service valuation efforts focus on a few services <br /> that can be most easily quantified and tend to ignore or qualitatively discuss <br /> the rest.26 <br /> These difficulties notwithstanding,California has much to gain by adopting <br /> a more comprehensive approach to assessing the value of ecosystem services. <br /> Even where full economic valuation is not practical,an approach that considers <br /> nonmarket functions of aquatic ecosystems can inform and guide decisions for <br /> water supply and flood management to maximize overall benefits(Chapters 5,6). <br /> Considering the value of ecosystem services comports well with recent state leg- <br /> islation and policies seeking to establish "co-equal" goals for ecosystem health <br /> and water supply(Chapter 1).This approach also can help to dispel the myth that <br /> healthy aquatic ecosystems conflict with a healthy economy(Hanak et al.2010). <br /> Water and Energy <br /> Water is heavy;average urban use(about 200 gallons per capita per day) comes <br /> to over 1,500 pounds a day. So the energy needed to move water can be consid- <br /> erable. This is particularly true for Southern California's urban water supplies, <br /> which often involve lifting large amounts of water over mountains.These pump- <br /> ing costs alone offer considerable incentive for water conservation (Wilkinson <br /> 2000). In addition to long-standing management concerns about the high cost <br /> of energy involved in water production and use(Palmer and Lund 1986),there <br /> have been growing policy concerns about greenhouse gas emissions from both <br /> the production and use of water.In the latter context,it is frequently reported that <br /> water use accounts for roughly 20 percent of the state's electricity use,making it a <br /> target for state policy efforts to reduce emissions(California Air Resources Board <br /> 2008). However, public discussions of this issue do not usually recognize that <br /> almost three-quarters of water-related energy use occurs in the homes,businesses, <br /> offices, and farms of end users (Table 2.5). Less than one-quarter is devoted to <br /> operating local,regional,and statewide water infrastructure. <br /> Most water-related energy use is in the urban sector.The most energy-intensive <br /> urban uses involve water heating, electricity for washing machines, chilling <br /> water and ice,and in-building pumps for spas,hot water circulation,evaporative <br /> coolers,etc., as well as industrial and commercial processes.Agricultural end <br /> 26. A recent study by the Science Advisory Board for the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency(2009)discusses a <br /> variety of methods for valuing ecosystem services:(1)measures of public attitudes—surveys and focus groups that elicit <br /> public preferences for ecosystem services,(2)economic methods—methods to estimate how much people are willing to <br /> spend to avoid losing a service,and(3)civil valuation methods—public referenda or initiatives,which provide informa- <br /> tion about how much the voting population values particular services. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.