My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0087014_SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CARROLTON
>
18163
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0087014_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2024 9:12:12 AM
Creation date
8/17/2023 1:11:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0087014
PE
2602
STREET_NUMBER
18163
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
CARROLTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
RIPON
Zip
95366
APN
24538026
ENTERED_DATE
8/1/2023 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
18163 S CARROLTON RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
353
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
California Water Today 105 <br /> Under federal law,homes in these areas are not required to have flood insur- <br /> ance, and land use is not regulated. Levees protect many homes that would <br /> otherwise be located in the 100-year floodplain. Flood insurance subscription <br /> in California is low. In 2006, just over 30 percent of the households in the <br /> 100-year floodplain had flood insurance and just 7 percent of those within the <br /> 101 to 500-year floodplain had insurance.31 <br /> Overall, this system protects most of California's Central Valley from the <br /> most frequent floods,with the exception of parts of the Delta.Parts of Southern <br /> California,the California coast,and local streams in Northern California have <br /> recurrent localized flooding problems,as evidenced by the number of federally <br /> declared flood disaster events since the late 1970s(Figure 2.14).For large floods, <br /> which occur only a few times per century on average,many parts of the state face <br /> much greater challenges. The Sacramento area, in particular,has been singled <br /> out as having some of the weakest flood defenses of any major metropolitan <br /> area in the country,well below New Orleans—a fact not missed by California's <br /> media and policy community following Hurricane Katrina's devastation of New <br /> Orleans.32 A large flood in the Sacramento area would put thousands of lives at <br /> risk and lay waste to tens of billions of dollars in property damage.13 <br /> Hurricane Katrina brought renewed attention to flood risks and flood infra- <br /> structure in California,the poor state of many levees,the growing numbers of <br /> residents living in areas with high flood risk, and the potential for increasing <br /> flood risk with climate change(Chapter 1).34 In 2005,federal authorities began <br /> requiring testing and recertification of all levees in communities that wish to <br /> maintain access to federal flood insurance, resulting in the downgrading of <br /> 31. Authors'calculations using estimates ofhouseholds in floodplains(seethe preceding footnote)and data on insurance <br /> by zone for California's communities from the Federal Emergency Management Agency.In contrast,over 80 percent of <br /> U.S.homes have fire insurance,a hazard that strikes about 0.3 percent of homes per year(a 1-in-330 chance per year) <br /> (authors'calculations using data from the National Fire Protection Association(www.nfpa.org),the National Association <br /> of Insurance Commissioners(www.naic.org),and the U.S.Census).California fire insurance coverage and fire frequency <br /> rates appear roughly similar to these national averages. <br /> 32. On August 31,2005,a Sacramento Bee article titled"New Orleans flooding`wake-up call'for capital"gave an early <br /> diagnosis:"Levee failures...[are]a chilling reminder that the two cities have a lot in common"(Weiser 2005).The website <br /> of the Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency(SAFCA)depicts a graphic comparing the flood risk of Sacramento with <br /> that of a number of other major cities,including New Orleans(www.safca.org/floodRisk/floodfb reat.html). <br /> 33. In the area managed by SAFCA(the City of Sacramento and part of Sacramento County),property losses from <br /> flooding are projected to be close to$20 billion in 2019(Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency 2008),and many other <br /> communities are at high risk of flooding at the same time,including West Sacramento,Yuba City,Marysville,and <br /> surrounding areas.Ongoing efforts to upgrade SAFCA levees are likely to reduce the likelihood of flooding from about <br /> 1.5 percent per year to about 0.5 percent per year(www.safca.org).But Sacramento will still face large residual risks <br /> (defined as damage times likelihood)of more than$90 million per year.Moreover,in some low-lying areas such as <br /> Natomas,levee failures could still put many lives at risk. <br /> 34. The California Department of Water Resources(2005a)issued a white paper on the coming flood crisis in January <br /> 2005,months before Katrina,and the Federal Emergency Management Agency issued its order for levee recertification <br /> a week before Katrina.But both state and federal policy attention was clearly galvanized by the devastation caused by <br /> the hurricane. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.