My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0087014_SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CARROLTON
>
18163
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0087014_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2024 9:12:12 AM
Creation date
8/17/2023 1:11:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0087014
PE
2602
STREET_NUMBER
18163
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
CARROLTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
RIPON
Zip
95366
APN
24538026
ENTERED_DATE
8/1/2023 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
18163 S CARROLTON RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
353
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
California Water Today 107 <br /> some levees and reclassification of some areas as within the 100-year floodplain. <br /> In 2006,state voters approved nearly$5 billion in bonds to fund flood system <br /> upgrades, and in 2007,the state legislature passed,and the governor signed,a <br /> set of flood policy bills to raise the level of flood protection in urban areas and <br /> reduce new development in high-risk areas. Although this renewed attention <br /> to flood protection is valuable, more fundamental policy shifts are needed to <br /> protect California's residents from harm and to improve the environmental <br /> performance of flood infrastructure(Chapters 5,6). <br /> Water System Management and Finance <br /> In the United States, most water management is local, and California is no <br /> exception. Although state and federal legislatures, agencies, and courts have <br /> roles in all aspects of water management, thousands of local entities have the <br /> frontline responsibility for serving customers, complying with water quality <br /> regulations, and raising revenues to cover the operations, maintenance, and <br /> capital investments needed to support these tasks. The governance of water <br /> in California also involves many nongovernmental interest-based organiza- <br /> tions and many large and small private groups,including business interests and <br /> ultimately the general public, which make water-related decisions in homes, <br /> in businesses and farms, and at the ballot box. In this section,we review the <br /> primary roles of different players in managing water,including their opportuni- <br /> ties to improve their management and their principal constraints—financial <br /> and otherwise.We begin with local decisionmakers (the most numerous and <br /> important group) and proceed to state, federal, and other groups involved in <br /> managing California's water. <br /> An"Adhocracy"of Decentralized Decisionmakers <br /> Although the federal and state governments played a major role in large-scale <br /> water infrastructure development, California's water system remains highly <br /> decentralized,with roots dating back to the Era of Local Organization in the <br /> late 19th century(Chapter 1).35 Well over a thousand specialized and general <br /> purpose local governments,water companies,and other organizations manage <br /> water locally (Table 2.6). Several dozen wholesale utilities sell water to other <br /> water agencies,and roughly 400 large retail utilities(those serving at least 3,000 <br /> 35. This reality contrasts with traditional views of water management in the western United States,which emphasize <br /> the role of the state and especially federal governments(e.g.,Worster 1985). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.