Laserfiche WebLink
California Water Today 109 <br /> local and regional public and private entities manage over 150 hydroelectric <br /> facilities.In some areas,local resource conservation districts are charged with <br /> overseeing ecosystem-related land and water management. <br /> This institutional diversity creates the potential for innovation and flexible <br /> responses to management challenges,but it can also limit the scope for effec- <br /> tive coordination (Bish 1982). Coordination can be particularly important— <br /> indeed necessary—when water management involves multiple functions, or <br /> when the scope of management is geographically defined.For instance,water <br /> and wastewater utilities need to collaborate to effectively manage recycled <br /> wastewater programs,and significant problems can occur if land use authori- <br /> ties do not coordinate with water suppliers, wastewater utilities, and flood <br /> management agencies when making zoning and land-use-permitting deci- <br /> sions. Coordination at the level of groundwater basins is required to limit <br /> problems of groundwater overdraft,and broader watershed coordination can <br /> create benefits that cut across institutional lines(e.g.,recharging aquifers with <br /> stormwater to augment water supply and limit polluted runoff from enter- <br /> ing local streams). Coordination also can enable local entities to realize scale <br /> economies in some activities. <br /> Some of California's local water management entities already benefit from <br /> structures that facilitate coordination. For instance, a few agencies manage <br /> both water supply and floods,and about 40 percent of water utilities also treat <br /> wastewater.38 About 70 percent of large urban water utilities belong to wholesale <br /> networks,the largest of which—the Metropolitan Water District of Southern <br /> California—indirectly serves roughly 18 million of the state's residents.39 <br /> Utilities that jointly manage water and wastewater and members of wholesale <br /> networks produced significantly better urban water management plans than <br /> utilities not benefitting from this integration(Hanak 2009a).The physical link- <br /> ages and institutional arrangements within wholesale networks also can sig- <br /> nificantly improve the capacity to respond to supply shortfalls.Many Southern <br /> California utilities are also linked through their membership in adjudicated <br /> basins,supervised by court-appointed water masters who oversee water supply <br /> and use;such adjudications facilitate the trading of supplies 40 <br /> 38. Estimates on the share of joint water and wastewater utilities are from Hanak(2005b).Examples of agencies that <br /> provide both water supply and flood control functions include the Yuba County Water Agency and the Santa Clara <br /> Valley Water District. <br /> 39. Estimate on the share of retail utilities within wholesale networks is from Hanak(2005b). <br /> 40. For instance,sales ofwater between members of the Mojave Basin and several other Southern California adjudicated <br /> basins are common(Water Strategist,various issues). <br />