Laserfiche WebLink
California Water Today 111 <br /> development of the large interregional water projects that form the backbone of <br /> California's water infrastructure. State and federal environmental laws enacted <br /> beginning in the late 1960s have fundamentally reshaped the context of almost <br /> all water management decisions.The absence of legislative action has also left its <br /> mark.Notably,the failure of California's legislature to include groundwater in the <br /> modern Water Code in 1913 and its subsequent failure to regulate groundwater <br /> have resulted in the fragmented and often ineffective management of this resource. <br /> Over time, state legislation also has shaped the institutional framework of <br /> California's decentralized water management system by establishing the author- <br /> ity of cities, counties, and the various forms of special districts that operate in <br /> California(Chapter 1;Hundley 2001).Over the past three decades,most state water <br /> legislation has sought to require or facilitate action by these decentralized entities <br /> (Table 2.7).A variety of laws aim to improve local planning and coordination,and <br /> some impose conservation efforts on local entities.In the 1980s,a suite of laws was <br /> enacted to facilitate the transfer of water between local agencies and water users <br /> through water markets.Beginning in the early 1990s,a series of laws mandating <br /> the use of low-flow plumbing devices and appliances have also targeted water <br /> conservation by end users.Although local districts often object to such measures, <br /> state-imposed requirements can make it easier for them to withstand local opposi- <br /> tion.For instance,2004 legislation requiring that all utilities install water meters <br /> and begin billing by the amount of water used targeted many unmetered Central <br /> Valley communities,where local opposition to metering had prevented reform. <br /> These laws have facilitated incremental improvements in water management <br /> at the local level.In recent decades,however,the legislature has had less success <br /> instituting broader changes that will be necessary to meet future management <br /> challenges.For instance,two laws enacted as part of the 2009 water policy pack- <br /> age—on groundwater monitoring and on water rights enforcement—addressed <br /> crucial areas of reform but were significantly watered down in response to <br /> opposition from local stakeholders. <br /> Administrative agencies <br /> Over time, state and federal legislation has also established state and federal <br /> agencies concerned with different aspects of California's water system(Table 2.8). <br /> These agencies regulate and support the actions of local entities,and many also <br /> manage large water supply, flood, and environmental management projects. <br /> Some state and federal agencies also collect and analyze data to improve the <br /> technical and scientific basis for decisionmaking. <br />