Laserfiche WebLink
Biological Resources Evaluation Report <br /> Griffith Energy Project <br /> 3.6 Wildlife Movement <br /> Methods <br /> The Essential Connectivity Map located on CDFW's Biogeographic and Information Observation System <br /> (BIOS) Habitat Connectivity Viewer was reviewed to determine if the Project site is located within or near a <br /> CDFW designated Natural Landscape Block (N LB) or Essential Connectivity Area (ECA) (CDFW 2021 b). <br /> The Essential Connectivity Map serves to focus attention on large areas important to maintaining ecological <br /> integrity at the broadest scale. NLBs and ECAs describe habitats that provide refuges for wildlife and <br /> corridors for wildlife movement between wildlands. <br /> Results <br /> Per the BIOS Habitat Connectivity Viewer, the Project site lies within an area designated as category 4 <br /> (Conservation Planning Linkages) of CDFW's Terrestrial Connectivity Areas of Conservation Emphasis. <br /> However, due to the broad, State-wide nature of the Essential Connectivity Map, use of macro-scale data, <br /> and its focus on connecting very large blocks of natural lands, it is unlikely that conditions specific to the <br /> Project site have been incorporated into the analysis. The Project site is within the California Bay Area <br /> Linkage Network (Penrod et al. 2013), which identifies areas that are either high quality habitat or highly <br /> permeable to wildlife movement and connects larger wildlands with smaller wildlands. The Project site is <br /> also within a San Joaquin Valley Wildlife Corridor (Huber 2006). San Joaquin Valley Wildlife Corridors <br /> connect areas of conservation opportunity to healthy, native habitats. Since the Project site is located within <br /> the designated areas described above, it has the potential to contain or function as a wildlife movement <br /> corridor. However, these designated areas also extend far beyond the boundaries of the Project site and <br /> have not incorporated conditions specific to the site into the analysis. <br /> Other factors considered when reviewing habitat connectivity of the Project site were: <br /> • Paved roads are located along the western and northern boundaries of the Project site and the <br /> entire site is surrounded by cattle fencing. <br /> • The Project site consists of a relatively small footprint that would not substantially reduce habitat <br /> connectivity in the region. The ability of wildlife to move through areas adjacent to the Project site <br /> would be unaffected. <br /> • The Project site contains small mammal burrows and foraging habitat to adequately support local <br /> wildlife species and enable movement through the site. <br /> Impacts to habitat connectivity would be evaluated during the CEQA process. Any measures required to <br /> avoid, minimize, or mitigate impacts to habitat connectivity would be proposed at that time. <br /> Tetra Tech, Inc. 3-4 July 2023 <br />