My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0015801
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PATTERSON PASS
>
20042
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-2200137
>
SU0015801
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2024 1:55:05 PM
Creation date
8/31/2023 1:18:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0015801
PE
2675
FACILITY_NAME
PA-2200137
STREET_NUMBER
20042
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
PATTERSON PASS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377-
APN
20910019, 99B-7885-002, 99B-7590-1-3
ENTERED_DATE
8/29/2023 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
20042 W PATTERSON PASS RD
RECEIVED_DATE
11/14/2023 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
987
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Biological Resources Evaluation Report <br /> Griffith Energy Project <br /> 4.4 Special-Status Species Habitat Assessment <br /> The BSA was surveyed for special-status species and their habitats.Any potential burrows/dens and burrow <br /> surrogates for BUOW, SJKF, or American badger were mapped and photographed. To assess habitat for <br /> rare plants, soil types, vegetation cover, and disturbance on the Project site were evaluated. Habitat <br /> assessments conducted for CTS, Swainson's hawk, and SJKF are described in the subsections below. <br /> 4.4.1 California Tiger Salamander and California Red-Legged Frog <br /> To assess CTS and CRLF upland and aquatic habitat, the presence of small mammal burrows, water <br /> bodies on the project site, vegetation and debris cover, the grazing regime, and the presence of predatory <br /> and competing species were evaluated. Important CTS habitat features include ephemeral pools and a <br /> relative abundance of small mammal burrows (USFWS 2004). Methods for identification and assessment <br /> of potential CTS breeding sites in the Project vicinity is described in the subsection below. Important CRLF <br /> habitat features include shrubby or emergent riparian vegetation along still or slow-moving water at two- <br /> feet depth or greater. Habitat requirements for CRLF also include small mammal burrows or damp <br /> vegetation, such as leaf litter, for use during summer. <br /> 4.4.1.1 Assessment of Barriers to California Tiger Salamander Migration <br /> An assessment of barriers to CTS migration between the nearest known and potential breeding ponds and <br /> the Project site was conducted. Potential breeding sites were identified using aerial imagery and hydrologic <br /> spatial data from the NWI (USFWS 2021) and NHD (USGS 2021). Previously documented breeding sites <br /> were identified using search results from the CNDDB (CDFW 2021a). Each potential breeding site was <br /> visited during the survey and notes were recorded on features that may restrict the ability of CTS to access <br /> the site (e.g., roads, walls, steep slopes, trenches). Habitat data, such as water body feature type and <br /> surrounding vegetation, for each breeding site was also recorded. Paved and dirt roads are not considered <br /> as barriers to CTS migration, but high-density residential development and Interstate Highways are <br /> considered significant physical barriers (USFWS 2003). Non-lethal barriers were also taken into account. <br /> Non-lethal barriers include structures longer than 12 meters and above the recommended minimum barrier <br /> height for fencing meant to divert amphibians,12-15 inches (Langton and Clevenger 2021). Features which <br /> could facilitate access, such as culverts or small mammal burrows, were also noted. When possible, <br /> binoculars were used from vantage points to survey sites that were on private property. Notes and <br /> photographs were recorded for all accessible sites within the 1.24-miles of the Project site. <br /> 4.4.2 Swainson's Hawk <br /> A raptor nesting habitat assessment was conducted in the Project site and surrounding 0.5-mile buffer. <br /> Aerial imagery and binoculars were used to find and survey potential trees and other features (e.g., power <br /> poles)that could be used for raptor nesting. Visual surveys for nests and perched raptors were performed. <br /> Potential Swainson's hawk nesting features (e.g.,trees, power poles)were mapped within a 0.5-mile buffer <br /> of the Project site. <br /> 4.4.3 San Joaquin Kit Fox <br /> A SJKF habitat assessment was conducted in the Project site and 150-meter buffer. Meandering transects <br /> were performed to evaluate potential denning habitat and prey availability. Potential dens and manmade <br /> features (e.g., culverts and drainage pipes) within the required size and depth range for SJKF were <br /> photographed and mapped. Observations of small mammals and the presence of small mammal burrows <br /> were used to assess the availability of prey. The presence of potential predators or competitors (e.g., large <br /> hawks, coyotes, domestic dogs)was also recorded. <br /> Tetra Tech, Inc. 4-2 July 2023 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.