Laserfiche WebLink
Biological Resources Evaluation Report <br /> Griffith Energy Project <br /> Table 5. Potential Barriers to California Tiger Salamander Migration <br /> Potential Pool <br /> Barrier Location Affected Impact to California Tiger Salamander Migration <br /> by Barrier <br /> The substation has a raised concrete foundation that covers <br /> approximately 75 acres within the 1.24-mile buffer. Since this is <br /> Approximately a type of high-density development, it could affect CTS <br /> PG&E Tesla 0.3 miles west migration depending on which direction CTS move from Pool 1. <br /> Substation of the Project 1 If CTS meander northeast from Pool 1, they would reach this <br /> site barrier. However,the substation can be avoided by CTS <br /> traveling from Pool 1 if they migrate directly east towards the <br /> Project site. Therefore, this substation is a partial barrier to CTS <br /> migration. <br /> The railroad acts as a barrier in areas where it is on a raised <br /> berm. The berm is at an approximately 33 percent slope and <br /> Approximately occurs along the ephemeral stream crossing from Pool 2 <br /> Union Pacific 0.3 miles towards the Project site(Figure 7).Therefore, CTS migration <br /> Railroad south of the 2 from Pool 2 would be impeded. However, CTS migration from <br /> Project site Pools 3 and 4 would not be impeded by the railroad because <br /> dispersal from the southeast portion of the 1.24-mile buffer <br /> would not require crossing slopes greater than 14 percent. <br /> Lack of development south of the Project site has resulted in relatively unimpeded potential CTS migration <br /> from most potential breeding ponds in that area.Specifically, migration from Pool 1 is affected by one partial <br /> barrier, dispersal from Pool 2 is affected by one barrier, and Pools 3 and 4 have no barriers to CTS <br /> migration. Based on this assessment, CTS could migrate through the Project site. <br /> 5.5.3 California Red-Legged Frog <br /> CRLF is a Federally threatened species and a CDFW Species of Special Concern. The Project site is not <br /> located within CRLF Critical Habitat; however, the Project site provides potential estivation habitat in the <br /> form of a perennial cattle trough and California ground squirrel burrows. Ideally, breeding habitat has <br /> emergent vegetation and still or slow-moving water at 2-foot depth or deeper. Water must last a minimum <br /> of 4-6 months for breeding and metamorphosis. This species is also known to use stock ponds and cattle <br /> troughs for breeding (Hemingway 2005). Ideal upland habitat are creek, seeps, or freshwater-spring <br /> corridors with riparian vegetation, but this species can occupy different types of upland habitats, including <br /> annual grassland (e.g.,Avena spp.—Bromus spp. herbaceous semi-natural alliance). CRLF upland habitat <br /> is typically located within 1 mile of a breeding site. The Project site is not within a 1-mile distance of known <br /> CRLF breeding habitat. <br /> Although there are no known breeding ponds within a 1-mile distance from the Project site (CDFW 2021 a), <br /> there are two potential breeding ponds within 1 mile of the site. One pond is covered in bulrush (Scripus <br /> sp.) and is located 120 feet north of Via Nicolo Road, approximately 1 mile east of the Project site (Pool 5, <br /> Figure 7). If this pond holds water, then it could provide potential breeding habitat for CRLF. Pool 1 may <br /> also provide potential breeding habitat for CRLF but is located at the maximum dispersal distance for this <br /> species of 1 mile(Figure 7). Based on the NWI search and aerial imagery,there are at least seven additional <br /> cattle ponds that hold water through August, approximately 1.5 miles to the west and southwest of the <br /> Project site. The Project site is also surrounded by four ephemeral creeks within 0.5 to 1 mile which could <br /> facilitate safe dispersal for CRLF from these potential breeding sites to the Project site. CNDDB records <br /> have previously documented one breeding pond 1.5 miles northwest of the Project site in 2004 (CDFW <br /> 2021 a). CNDDB records also document this species 2 miles from the project site in 1996, 2001, 2004, and <br /> 2008 (CDFW 2021 a). In addition, within 3 to 5 miles from the Project site, the CNDDB has records of eight <br /> breeding ponds(CDFW 2021 a).About half of these sites are within Corral Hollow Creek; however,dispersal <br /> from this Creek to the Project site is unlikely because CRLF would have to migrate over a steep elevation <br /> Tetra Tech, Inc. 5-11 July 2023 <br />