Laserfiche WebLink
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> In summary, the soil conditions examined near the proposed septic disposal area for the <br /> new house on the Site were found to be suitable for a septic system. A satisfactory soil <br /> percolation rate of 3.79 min/in was observed in the shallow soil zone at the test location. <br /> The soil in the test location was found to be clay and sandy clay. <br /> Based on maps of recent aquifer levels, the depth of ground water is approximately 50 <br /> to 63 feet below ground surface. Ground water flows generally to the east or southeast <br /> in the area at a rate of approximately 2 to 4 feet per mile. <br /> A water sample was collected from the domestic well on the Site. Nitrate was detected <br /> at a concentration of 9.2 m/L-N in the sample, under the MCL of 10 mg/L. The nitrate <br /> level near the MCL is likely due to the close proximity of the well to the existing septic <br /> system; it is also likely that this well is older and relatively shallow. DBCP was not <br /> detected in the sample. <br /> Based on the methods and assumptions described, the nitrate loading calculation <br /> indicates that existing and future on-site septic drain field systems on the Site have the <br /> potential to cause a buildup of nitrate in the aquifer up to 16.2 mg/L-N, above the MCL <br /> of 10 mg/L-N. It should be remembered that the Hantzsche and Finnemore equation is <br /> a conservative method for determining potential impacts, and actual nitrate loading <br /> experienced on the Site over time may be less than predicted. The clay soil and <br /> relatively deep ground water in the area may serve to limit the transportation of nitrate to <br /> the aquifer. Existing wells in the area do not show nitrate exceedances, and the actual <br /> nitrate loading experienced on the Site over time may be significantly less than <br /> predicted. <br /> Recent San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department policy has been to <br /> evaluate each project on a case-by-case basis to determine the level of nitrate <br /> mitigation warranted. Although Live Oak cannot make engineering recommendations, <br /> we are aware that the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department often <br /> allows the use of an oversized septic tank to mitigate nitrate impacts; this option may be <br /> worth exploring for the Site. Use of a shallow system (sumps rather than seepage pits) <br /> could provide additional nitrate mitigation due to adsorption of nitrate ions to the clay <br /> soil over the increased vadose zone. Alternatively, an engineered nitrate-mitigating <br /> septic system could be utilized to address nitrate loading. <br /> Another point to consider is that the Site is located in a small neighborhood of Stockton <br /> that utilizes septic systems (approximately 30 systems by our estimation), while the <br /> surrounding neighborhoods utilize municipal sewer services. As a result, septic impacts <br /> in this area should be quite low considering the density of development in the area. It is <br /> possible that sewer connections could be offered to these remaining properties in the <br /> LOGE 2325 Page 15 <br />