Laserfiche WebLink
Ash- <br /> 4k, <br /> CalRecycle <br /> Compostable Materials Handling Operation and Facility Inspection Report (93) <br /> ira rl�enAge County of San Joaquin <br /> WWII <br /> e " PrdigKai + 4d "� � t� <br /> •u ..".. .,arz.. .�. o .:.:,, afl.3k4sK?k.,. 't <br /> 39-AA-0020 9/18/2013 LEA Periodic <br /> Mhn 12:15 pm Timeout 16MIN 1:30 pm frspcf�or►T�me <br /> Forward Resource Recovery Facility Forward, Inc./Allied Waste North America <br /> � 1. <br /> 'i li i i <br /> i <br /> 9999 N. Austin Road, Manteca 95336 <br /> lnsc#4r �. z tzTi <br /> Also prQSerlt(Nairne) e s 4 u <br /> Benjamin Escotto IRuben Ramirez <br /> THE ABOVE FACILITY WAS INSPECTED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE DIVISION 30 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE(PRC)AND TIRE 14 AND TITLE 27 CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS(CCR) <br /> XtQ Ui4[atl4n 4r Areas of+C4ncer k1 } ¥ r' <br /> . ,sma*- <br /> fr Fulatl4ns [cx , ( r. I a ur 'a�" dNi1 II f I I I <br /> I %k ,} <br /> " ji i +�+ ... ,�t eIII.gI� 1 ! 5` a air <br /> i � i l� i i .. >k <br /> ...,.�; .,�.�.: ",.. .. ..:. .. ." � <br /> Routine monthly inspection conducted on this date and the following was noted: <br /> 1. Previous area of concern regarding employees not wearing hard hats has been corrected. <br /> A personal protective equipment training was conducted and documented. <br /> 2. An odor complaint was received by the San Joaquin County Environmental Health <br /> Department. Robert McClellon (program coordinator)and Michael Kith (lead senior)did <br /> a site investigation from 9/10/13 to 9/12/13. They did not find anything that <br /> substantiated the complaint. Also Scott Van Dyken, air quality inspector for the San <br /> Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, did a site investigation on 9/12/13 in <br /> response to an odor complaint. According to Mr. Dyken during a phone conversation, no <br /> odors were detected (complaint was not substantiated). <br /> 3. Facility has stopped receiving cannery waste for composting. The final day of receipt of <br /> the cannery waste was on 9/16/13. Documentation showing this was available for review. <br /> According to the facility, any cannery waste received is now being taken to the landfill for <br /> disposal. <br /> 4. The temperature and turning records were reviewed. An error was observed for windrows <br /> #41 and #42. The records for these windrows state that pathogen reduction was met <br /> after 4 turnings. Facility was told that pathogen reduction can only be met with 5 <br /> turnings. They were instructed to correct the errors on the records. This issue will be <br /> looked at for correction during the next monthly inspection. <br /> 5. There was separation between the manually screened greenwaste pile and the unscreened <br /> greenwaste received. <br /> 6. The fly population was light. Fly traps were observed on site. <br /> 7. All records were available for review. <br /> 8. The temperature of the greenwaste and overs was 85 F and 92 F respectively. The <br /> temperature range of the ground material and windrows was 102 F to 110 F and 123 F to <br /> 146 F respectively. The temperature range of the pre-screened product and the screened <br /> product was 109 F to 116 F and 118 F to 133 F respectively. <br />