My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_4/7/22 [REV] APPENDICES W/FIRE PERMIT
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440011
>
CORRESPONDENCE_4/7/22 [REV] APPENDICES W/FIRE PERMIT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/30/2024 8:31:35 AM
Creation date
5/14/2024 10:57:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
4/7/22 [REV] APPENDICES W/FIRE PERMIT
RECORD_ID
PR0440011
PE
4445
FACILITY_ID
FA0006918
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD RESOURCE RECOVERY FACI
STREET_NUMBER
9999
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106003
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
338
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Forward Resource Recovery Facility WDR Technical Report <br /> <br />HDR Engineering, Inc. 6 October 2021 <br /> <br />Stockton, CA 24-hour, 25-year storm <br />NOAA, National Weather Service, Hydrometeorological Design Studies Center <br />http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/ <br />2.2 Geology <br />The following geological data was obtained from the facility’s JTD, which is hereby incorporated <br />by reference. The Forward Landfill is located in the Great Valley geomorphic province, which lies <br />between the Sierra Nevada Range on the east and the Coast Range on the west. Regional <br />geology includes the following types and origins of sediments, from oldest to youngest: Marine <br />Sequence, Continental Sediment Sequence, and the Victor Formation. <br />Exploratory borings and well installation programs performed at the site indicated that geologic <br />materials beneath the site occur as lenticular units composed of clay, silt, and sand with minor <br />amounts of gravel. Bedding ranges in thickness from a few inches to approximately 20 feet, which <br />is consistent with deposition in a fluvial environment where the course of rivers or streams <br />meanders and is subject to frequent flooding. The sediments observed in borings at the site <br />appear to correspond with Pleistocene age Victor Formation and can be divided into the following <br />three large groups: <br />• Group A: Highly interbedded sand, sandy silt, clayey silt, silt, and clay. Most of the <br />sediments have a highly oxidized appearance (orange-brown color). This group is <br />located from the surface to approximately 28 to 40 feet below ground. <br />• Group B: Interbedded sand, silty sand, silt, and clay. Sediments are less oxidized than <br />Group A (gray-brown color). This group is located from approximately from <br />approximately 28 to 40 feet deep (top) to 55 to 75 feet deep (bottom). <br />• Group C: Fine- to medium-grained sand with some coarse-grained or gravelly layers. <br />A few layers of silt and clay. Color is light brown to yellow brown. This group is located <br />approximately 55 to 75 feet deep (top) to 110 feet (bottom). <br />2.3 Hydrogeology <br />General <br />As described in the facility’s JTD, incorporated here by reference, the surface soils near the site are <br />primarily Clear Lake clay (CL) and Jacktone clay (ST), which are typical of Victor Formation <br />sediments. The Clear Lake clay occurs primarily on the northern and southern portions of the site, <br />while the Jacktone clay is more prevalent in the middle portion. Subsurface soils generally consist of <br />interbedded layers of sand, silt, and lean clay. <br /> <br />Hydraulic Conductivity <br />Forward, Inc. performed a sampling and testing program to assess the permeability of the <br />compost pad areas. The results of that study are included in the Compost Facility Stormwater <br />Improvements Report from Lewis Engineering and in Appendix C of this report. Four samples <br />collected in the southern half of the composting operations area had vertical hydraulic <br />conductivities ranging from 4.9 x 10-6 to 1.5 x 10-7 cm/s. These results are compliant with the <br />parameters of the General Compost Order WDR, which requires a hydraulic conductivity of 1.0 x 10- <br />5 cm/s or less on the compost pad.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.