Laserfiche WebLink
Sammons, Lynsey [EHD] <br />Hi Lynsey, <br />Here is the update SPCC with the <br />Hi Michelle, <br />i <br />From: Sammons, Lynsey [EHD] <lsammons@sjgov.org> <br />Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2024 9:26 AM <br />To: Michelle Post <michelle.post@californiamaterials.com> <br />Cc: Saeed, Haza [EHD] <hsaeed@sjgov.org> <br />Subject: RE: CP22-AST Corrective Actions <br />Michelle Post cmichelle.post@californiamaterials.com> <br />Wednesday, July 31, 2024 1:42 PM <br />Sammons, Lynsey [EHD] <br />Saeed, Haza [EHD] <br />Re: CP22-AST Corrective Actions <br />California Materials SPCC Plan 31 Jul24 Final.pdf <br />From: <br />Sent: <br />To: <br />Cc: <br />Subject: <br />Attachments: <br />Safety/ Compliance <br />California Materials, INC <br />3736 S. Hwy 99 <br />Stockton, CA 95215 <br />Cell - 209-715-0094 <br />Office - 209-472-7422 Ex.25 <br />CMAT <br />AGGREGATES • TRUCKING <br />Regarding the APSA inspection for the ASTs on site, we're almost there. Again, just a few issues to close out the last few <br />items. I've closed out #s 3, 30, 32, 51, 52, and 79. There are four that have not been fully addressed or possibly just need <br />some clarification. Please see below: <br />• #13 - Is the facility claiming environmental equivalence for overfill prevention? In section 4.7 on page 27 the <br />updated SPCC plan states, "As allowed by 40 CFR Part 112.7(a)(2), overfill protection may be achieved via an <br />alternate method to achieve equivalent environmental protection. At CMAT overfill protection is achieved <br />procedurally." However, overfill is not mentioned at all in section 4.6 on the same page, which is the section on <br />environmental equivalence. This section only mentions secondary containment for the 55-gallon drums in the <br />shop and does not address the two topics identified in the inspection report (overfill prevention and integrity <br />new wording from out consultant. Please let me know if this will sub <br />vise, or if revision will need to be made.