My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2020
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
TINSLEY ISLAND RIVER
>
14344
>
3600 - Recreational Health Program
>
PR0360136
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2024 2:51:09 PM
Creation date
8/30/2024 2:45:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3600 - Recreational Health Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
PRE 2020
RECORD_ID
PR0360136
PE
3611
FACILITY_ID
FA0003025
FACILITY_NAME
ST FRANCIS YACHT CLUB
STREET_NUMBER
14344
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
TINSLEY ISLAND RIVER
STREET_TYPE
RTE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95209
APN
12909002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
14344 W TINSLEY ISLAND RIVER RTE
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\ymoreno
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC ITEALTH SERVIIICES <br />SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br />ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION <br />Karen Furst, M.D., M.P.H., Health Officer <br />304 East Weber Avenue, Third Floor • Stockton, CA 95202 <br />209/468-3420 <br />September 15, 1998 <br />James L. Whittaker, Chairman <br />Tinsley Island Committee <br />1289 Sanderling Isl. Rd. <br />Pt. Richmond, CA 94801-4116 <br />Re: Tinsley Island Swimming Pool <br />Dear Mr. Whittaker: <br />Your request for a variance to allow omission of the required fencing enclosure around <br />the proposed swimming pool at Tinsley Island cannot be granted. It is the opinion of the <br />Environmental Health Division (EHD) and that of San Joaquin County Counsel that Title <br />22, Section 65509 refers to plan approval pursuant to Section 65505. This section does <br />not provide an authorization to grant variances but rather a requirement that swimming <br />pools shall be constructed, reconstructed or altered in compliance with approved plans <br />unless a written approval of variance from such plans is obtained from the enforcement <br />agency. <br />The EHD cannot make the finding that there is sufficient reason to omit the requirement <br />for an enclosure of the pool area as required in Title 24, Section 2-9024. <br />For your information, the California Conference of Directors of Environmental appoints a <br />Technical Advisory Committee who reviews legislation, proposed regulations, and <br />develops non-binding positions concerning the interpretation of the laws and regulations <br />affecting pool construction and operation. EHD staff indicated that contacts contacts <br />with the chairman of this committee, Richard Kebabjian, REHS, indicated that the <br />committee would not support a variance to omit the fencing requirement concerning the <br />proposed pool. <br />I further contacted Dave Quinton, REHS, of the State Department of 1-TcaJih Services, <br />who is the State representative to the above-mentioned committee. Mr. Quinton is also <br />the State contact person concerning public swimming pool issues. He indicated that there <br />is no formal appeals procedure concerning laws and regulations; howc he legal staff <br />for the State Department of Health Services would be available to provide legal opinions. <br />Mr. Quinton can be reached at (916) 324-2208. <br />A Division of San Joaquin County Health Care Services
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.