COMPLIANCE INFO_2025 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

;,c-- " Outlook RE: PR0538822 - 2849 Myrtle St - UST Report From John Coose <jcoose@sjRTD.com> Date Tue 11/18/2025 4:08 PM To Rivera, Stacy [EHD] <srivera@sjgov.org> Cc Nik Zagorov <nzagorov@ecochek.com>; Saetern, Kristina Gaen [EHD] <ksaetern@sjgov.org>; Presto, Carol [EHD] <cpresto@sjgov.org>; Ciro Aguirre <caguirre@sjRTD.com> H i Stacy, In regards to the Return to Compliance dated October, 20 2025, I would like to clarify a few points. During our meeting on November 3, you reassured me that RTD is not at risk of being shut down after January 1, 2026. Does this still hold true? I ask this because it appears that we have been discussing two separate repair issues, and I wish to avoid any confusion so we can address concerns in a timely manner. In your voicemail, you mentioned that under the current regulations, RTD is out of compliance. I am not certain how to interpret ""out of compliance" and how to respond to the Return to Compliance (RTC) as noted. From the November 3rd meeting, my notes indicate that RTD is to install secondary containment and sensors, in the areas identified. I was made aware, that it is for the UDC's not for the flex pipe repair. I wanted to mention that the flex pipe repair would necessitate a complete redesign of the fuel system, which would require several months to achieve. From my conversations, (with you and Nik) this is what I understand. I need more input from EHD and EcoCheck to confirm this is accurate! • UDCs — Need a secondary container with sensors to monitor. • Flex pipe — Resolving this issue would require a full system redesign, as there is no double -walled flex pipe available for installation. The confusion on my part seems to stem from the fact that much of our recent discussion has focused on UDC repair, which we now understand is not part of the Return to Compliance. We were also being informed that the flex pipe issue is being addressed through revisions at the State level.