Laserfiche WebLink
Table 10 <br />CDCR Combined Shallow/Intermediate WBZ Parameter Results <br />Forward Landfill, Manteca, California <br />Test Pumped <br />Well Test Type Monitoring Well <br />Distance <br />from <br />Pumping <br />Well (ft) <br />Well Screened <br />Interval <br />Pumping Test Rate(s) <br />(gpm) <br />Specific <br />Capacity <br />(gal/ft <br />drawdown) <br />Well <br />Sustainable <br />Yield <br />(gpm) <br />Drawdown <br />Radius of <br />Influence <br />(ft) <br />Saturated <br />Thickness (ft) <br />Aquifer Type <br />per Method <br />Solution Used for <br />Analysis <br />Transmissivity (T) <br />(ft2/day) <br />Hydraulic <br />Conductivity (K) <br />(ft/day) <br />Hydraulic <br />Conductivity (K) <br />(cm/s) <br />Storativity <br />(S) <br />Step EW-2 0 Intermediate 10.1 / 15.1 / 20.1 / 24.5 1.8 - 2.2 40-50 --60 Unconfined Theis (Step Test)1 1,334 22 7.8E-03 2.1E-04 <br />Unconfined Theis2 5,006 83 2.9E-02 1.5E-02 <br />Unconfined Cooper-Jacob3 4,723 79 2.8E-02 5.3E-03 <br />Leaky Hantush4 1,880 31 1.1E-02 1.1E-03 <br />Unconfined Theis2 6,878 115 4.0E-02 8.6E-03 <br />Unconfined Cooper-Jacob3 4,637 77 2.7E-02 6.6E-02 <br />Leaky Hantush4 6,775 113 4.0E-02 8.5E-03 <br />Unconfined Theis2 3,816 64 2.2E-02 6.5E-03 <br />Unconfined Cooper-Jacob3 3,718 62 2.2E-02 2.1E-03 <br />Leaky Hantush4 3,025 50 1.8E-02 4.5E-03 <br />Unconfined Theis2 3,244 54 1.9E-02 1.3E-02 <br />Unconfined Cooper-Jacob3 3,439 57 2.0E-02 3.3E-03 <br />Leaky Hantush4 3,175 53 1.9E-02 5.0E-03 <br />Unconfined Theis2 5,546 92 3.3E-02 3.8E-02 <br />Unconfined Cooper-Jacob3 4,282 71 2.5E-02 7.7E-02 <br />Leaky Hantush4 5,448 91 3.2E-02 4.0E-02 <br />Unconfined Theis2 5,457 91 3.2E-02 1.0E-02 <br />Unconfined Cooper-Jacob3 4,797 80 2.8E-02 1.3E-02 <br />Leaky Hantush4 5,312 89 3.1E-02 1.0E-02 <br />Unconfined Theis2 6,487 108 3.8E-02 7.9E-03 <br />Unconfined Cooper-Jacob3 5,875 98 3.5E-02 8.4E-03 <br />Leaky Hantush4 6,104 102 3.6E-02 5.0E-03 <br />Unconfined Theis2 10,430 174 6.1E-02 1.5E-03 <br />Unconfined Cooper-Jacob3 6,791 113 4.0E-02 4.6E-03 <br />Leaky Hantush4 9,290 155 5.5E-02 1.4E-03 <br />Unconfined Theis2 10,560 176 6.2E-02 1.1E-03 <br />Unconfined Cooper-Jacob3 7,320 122 4.3E-02 1.5E-03 <br />Leaky Hantush4 9,592 160 5.6E-02 1.1E-03 <br />Average 5,534 92 3.3E-02 1.3E-02 <br />Notes: <br />% - percent <br />-- - not applicable <br />cm/s - centimeters per second <br />ft - feet <br />ft2 - square feet <br />gal/ft - gallons per foot <br />gpm - gallons per minute <br />CDCR - California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation <br />1Theis (1935) step-drawdown test - Type curve solution for a step-drawdown test in an confined aquifer with variable rate and well losses <br />2Theis (1935) - Type curve solution for a pumping test in an unconfined aquifer with variable rate and partial penetration. Jacob's correction for partial dewatering of aquifer applied to displacement data <br />3Cooper-Jacob (1946) - Striaght line solution for a pumping test in a unconfined aquifer with variable rate <br />4Hantush (1960) w/aquitard storage - type curve solution for a pumping/recovery testin a leaky confined aquifer with storage in the aquitard(s) with variable rate <br />Intermediate <br />Intermediate <br />EW-2 <br />PZ-1 21 Shallow <br />AMW-22S 107 Shallow <br />PZ-3 13 Intermediate <br />AMW-50M 388 <br />107AMW-22 <br />Intermediate <br />Constant Rate 60 <br />Shallow PZ-2 56 <br />ALL <br />ALL SHALLOW <br />ALL INTERMEDIATE <br />Variable <br />Variable <br />Variable Variable <br />Shallow <br />750.0EW-2 pumped at 24.5 ---- <br />Page 1 of 1