Laserfiche WebLink
Technical Memorandum <br />Arcadis U.S., Inc., 735 Tank Farm Road, Suite 150, San Luis Obispo, California, 805 706 2805, www.arcadis.com <br /> <br />Technical Memorandum 11-04-2022 <br />1/4 <br /> <br /> <br />SUBJECT TO <br />Response to October 19, 2022, Water Board Letter Daniel S. Kippen <br /> <br />DATE <br />November 4, 2022 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />On behalf of Forward, Inc., Arcadis U.S., Inc. (Arcadis) has prepared this Technical Memorandum for the Forward <br />Landfill (Forward, Inc.), 9999 S. Austin Road, Manteca, California. This memo presents a technical justification <br />and responses to the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (Water Board) questions regarding the <br />interim groundwater remediation approach for areas north of the landfill. In a letter dated October 19, 2022, the <br />Water Board presented the following four questions, and the responses are summarized below. <br />Water Board Question 1: Please provide the field notes, the well development logs, and the sieve analysis <br />data from the screen interval for EW-1. <br />Response: Attached to this letter are the boring, well construction, well development log, sieve analysis results for <br />soil samples collected from the screen interval, and hydraulic testing field forms for extraction well CDCR-EW-1. <br />Water Board Question 2: Section 3.c) of CAO R5-2017-0703 requires, in part, that β€œ[t]he extraction wells <br />shall be located near the center of plume mass and must be able to contain and treat the VOCs, create an <br />inward gradient of the groundwater table, measured from existing monitoring wells within the plume, in <br />all zones affected by the release.” Please describe how Forward will e xtract contamination from the <br />various zones impacted by the plume. <br />Response: Section 3.c) of Clean-up and Abatement Order (CAO) R5-2017-0703 requires an interim groundwater <br />plume remediation system that includes β€œthe installation of additional groundwater extraction wells to remediate <br />areas north of the landfill where the discharger identified total volatile organic compound (VOC) concentr ations in <br />groundwater exceeding 25 µg/l.” At the onset of 2022 the sole groundwater data point north of the landfill with <br />total VOC concentrations exceeding 25 micrograms per liter (µg/l) was the shallow water bearing zone monitoring <br />well location AMW-22S on the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) property; <br />therefore, this monitoring well location represented the center of plume mass to be contained and treated to <br />maintain compliance with the CAO. <br />In a letter submitted to Mr. Kippen on February 16, 2022, Forward recommended additional assessment activities <br />be conducted on the CDCR property before the installation of a groundwater plume remediation system to provide <br />sufficient data for extraction well placement. In the interests of expediting the interim remedy, however, the Water <br />Board directed Forward to revise their workplan and begin installation of the remediation system prior to collecting <br />additional assessment data. In response to this directive, Forward submitted the Revised CDCR Site Investigation <br />and Remedial Design Workplan Addendum to the Water Board on March 7, 2022. The Water Board provided <br />comments on this revised workplan on March 24, 2022. <br />In accordance with the approved March Work Plan, Arcadis and their subcontrac tors installed CDCR-EW-1, a 6- <br />inch diameter extraction well screened in the shallow water bearing zone beneath the CDCR property, in an <br />attempt to capture the >25 µg/l shallow zone plume mass in the vicinity of AMW -22S (approximately 140 feet <br />northeast of the extraction well location). Hydraulic testing of CDCR-EW-1, which included a step test and 12-hr <br />constant rate test, indicated the shallow zone extraction well is not capable of capturing the plume mass in the <br />vicinity of AMW-22S. The maximum sustainable flow rate was approximately 0.5 gallons per minute (gpm) with <br />approximately 7.9 feet of drawdown in the extraction well. Furthermore, the extraction well was not capable of